Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 34The Board, 1982 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 1
... filed another claim dated February 10 , 1982 , noting that she had stopped work on December 10 , 1981 and underwent surgery for her left foot condition . She returned to work January 25 , 1982 on light duty . Accompanying the second claim ...
... filed another claim dated February 10 , 1982 , noting that she had stopped work on December 10 , 1981 and underwent surgery for her left foot condition . She returned to work January 25 , 1982 on light duty . Accompanying the second claim ...
Strana 5
... claim for continuation of pay and notifying him that the continua- tion of pay already received " may " be declared ... filed a claim dated August 15 , 1979 , alleging that he injured his back on that date when " lifting a bundle of ...
... claim for continuation of pay and notifying him that the continua- tion of pay already received " may " be declared ... filed a claim dated August 15 , 1979 , alleging that he injured his back on that date when " lifting a bundle of ...
Strana 6
... claim consisted of various reports from Dr. Pat P. Neri , a chiropractor ... filed an appeal contending that " the deci- sion states that the issue is a ... filed within one year of such decision.1 The Office issued two letters on August ...
... claim consisted of various reports from Dr. Pat P. Neri , a chiropractor ... filed an appeal contending that " the deci- sion states that the issue is a ... filed within one year of such decision.1 The Office issued two letters on August ...
Strana 19
... case , the time began to run in May 1951 , and section 20 of the applicable FECA required that claims be filed within five years from that date . The maximum limitation of five years for filing of claims provided by section 20 is a ...
... case , the time began to run in May 1951 , and section 20 of the applicable FECA required that claims be filed within five years from that date . The maximum limitation of five years for filing of claims provided by section 20 is a ...
Strana 21
... claim was not filed within five years of the date the statutory time limitation period began to run , it was barred ; similarly , medical benefits were denied because there was no indication that his supervisor had timely actual ...
... claim was not filed within five years of the date the statutory time limitation period began to run , it was barred ; similarly , medical benefits were denied because there was no indication that his supervisor had timely actual ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accepted facts aggravation alleged appellant's appellant's claim appellant's condition appellant's disability April artery asbestosis audiogram August August 18 Board finds Board-certified orthopedic surgeon causal relationship causally related claimant compensation order dated continuation of pay December degenerative determined diagnosed disc disease Docket ECAB employee employee's employing establishment employment injury employment-related evaluation exposure February February 23 federal employment filed a claim GERALD LAMBOLEY hearing loss indicated that appellant internist issue January January 22 July June June 24 knee light duty loss of wage-earning low back lumbar lumbosacral March March 23 medical adviser reviewed medical evidence ment myocardial infarction November November 26 novo decision October Office hearing representative Office medical adviser Office of Workers Office referred appellant Office's opined osteoarthritis overpayment pain patient percent period physician pulmonary remanded report dated report from Dr schedule award September September 18 specialist spine statement of accepted symptoms tion U.S. Postal Service wage-earning capacity x-rays