Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 34The Board, 1982 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 99
Strana 6
... period you will be given the opportunity to charge the time to sick or annual leave . The agency may declare the salary received for the above period an overpayment , subject to recovery under 5 U.S.C. 5584. " The Office further ...
... period you will be given the opportunity to charge the time to sick or annual leave . The agency may declare the salary received for the above period an overpayment , subject to recovery under 5 U.S.C. 5584. " The Office further ...
Strana 9
... period from April 18 , 1980 to December 15 , 1981. A new schedule award should be issued for the period commencing December 15 , 1981 for a 20 percent permanent loss of use of the right leg and a 19 percent permanent loss of use of the ...
... period from April 18 , 1980 to December 15 , 1981. A new schedule award should be issued for the period commencing December 15 , 1981 for a 20 percent permanent loss of use of the right leg and a 19 percent permanent loss of use of the ...
Strana 13
... period start- ing to run on that date , were improper . A schedule award is not payable until maximum improvement of ... period from April 18 , 1980 to December 15 , 1981. A new schedule award should be issued for the period commencing ...
... period start- ing to run on that date , were improper . A schedule award is not payable until maximum improvement of ... period from April 18 , 1980 to December 15 , 1981. A new schedule award should be issued for the period commencing ...
Strana 18
... period begins to run when the injured employee becomes aware or reasonably should be aware of a loss of hearing and a possible relationship between his hearing loss and his employment . Further , where an employee becomes aware that his ...
... period begins to run when the injured employee becomes aware or reasonably should be aware of a loss of hearing and a possible relationship between his hearing loss and his employment . Further , where an employee becomes aware that his ...
Strana 19
... period is that which was in effect on the date on which the limitation period began to run . In this case , the time began to run in May 1951 , and section 20 of the applicable FECA required that claims be filed within five years from ...
... period is that which was in effect on the date on which the limitation period began to run . In this case , the time began to run in May 1951 , and section 20 of the applicable FECA required that claims be filed within five years from ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accepted facts aggravation alleged appellant's appellant's claim appellant's condition appellant's disability April artery asbestosis audiogram August August 18 Board finds Board-certified orthopedic surgeon causal relationship causally related claimant compensation order dated continuation of pay December degenerative determined diagnosed disc disease Docket ECAB employee employee's employing establishment employment injury employment-related evaluation exposure February February 23 federal employment filed a claim GERALD LAMBOLEY hearing loss indicated that appellant internist issue January January 22 July June June 24 knee light duty loss of wage-earning low back lumbar lumbosacral March March 23 medical adviser reviewed medical evidence ment myocardial infarction November November 26 novo decision October Office hearing representative Office medical adviser Office of Workers Office referred appellant Office's opined osteoarthritis overpayment pain patient percent period physician pulmonary remanded report dated report from Dr schedule award September September 18 specialist spine statement of accepted symptoms tion U.S. Postal Service wage-earning capacity x-rays