Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 34The Board, 1982 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 1
... specialist . The specialist should be asked to render a reasoned opinion as to whether there was a causal relationship between the left foot condition and employment factors , particularly whether employment factors aggravated any ...
... specialist . The specialist should be asked to render a reasoned opinion as to whether there was a causal relationship between the left foot condition and employment factors , particularly whether employment factors aggravated any ...
Strana 4
... specialist . The specialist should be asked to render a reasoned opinion as to whether there is a causal relationship between the left foot condition and employ- ment factors , particularly whether employment factors aggravated any 1 ...
... specialist . The specialist should be asked to render a reasoned opinion as to whether there is a causal relationship between the left foot condition and employ- ment factors , particularly whether employment factors aggravated any 1 ...
Strana 14
... specialist for an opinion whether appellant's disability was hastened by factors of his employment . The specialist should be asked to comment on the effect of exposure to solvents , which occurred by the employing establishment's job ...
... specialist for an opinion whether appellant's disability was hastened by factors of his employment . The specialist should be asked to comment on the effect of exposure to solvents , which occurred by the employing establishment's job ...
Strana 18
... specialist for an opinion whether appellant's disability was hastened by factors of his employment . The specialist should be asked to comment on the effect of exposure to solvents , raised by Dr. Nuguid and shown to have occurred by ...
... specialist for an opinion whether appellant's disability was hastened by factors of his employment . The specialist should be asked to comment on the effect of exposure to solvents , raised by Dr. Nuguid and shown to have occurred by ...
Strana 26
... specialist in preventive medicine , that he was medically disqualified from working as an air traffic controller . The doctor stated that , based on the aforementioned medical reports , it was concluded that appellant was " not very ...
... specialist in preventive medicine , that he was medically disqualified from working as an air traffic controller . The doctor stated that , based on the aforementioned medical reports , it was concluded that appellant was " not very ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accepted facts aggravation alleged appellant's appellant's claim appellant's condition appellant's disability April artery asbestosis audiogram August August 18 Board finds Board-certified orthopedic surgeon causal relationship causally related claimant compensation order dated continuation of pay December degenerative determined diagnosed disc disease Docket ECAB employee employee's employing establishment employment injury employment-related evaluation exposure February February 23 federal employment filed a claim GERALD LAMBOLEY hearing loss indicated that appellant internist issue January January 22 July June June 24 knee light duty loss of wage-earning low back lumbar lumbosacral March March 23 medical adviser reviewed medical evidence ment myocardial infarction November November 26 novo decision October Office hearing representative Office medical adviser Office of Workers Office referred appellant Office's opined osteoarthritis overpayment pain patient percent period physician pulmonary remanded report dated report from Dr schedule award September September 18 specialist spine statement of accepted symptoms tion U.S. Postal Service wage-earning capacity x-rays