 | New York (State). Court of Common Pleas (City and County of New York) - 1876 - 624 str.
...papers showing clearly that some question decisive of the case, and duly submitted by counsel, has been overlooked by the court; or that the decision...decision to which the attention of the court was not drawn, through the neglect or inadTertence of counsel " ( Mount v. MitchcU, 32 NY 702). Curley v. Tomlinson.... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1876 - 650 str.
...clearly showing either that some question, decisive of the case and duly submitted by counsel, has been overlooked by the court, or that the decision is in conflict with an express statute or a controlling decision overlooked by the court, or to which its attention was not drawn, through the... | |
 | New York (State) - 1881 - 178 str.
...papers clearly showing either that some question decisive of the case and duly submitted by counsel, has been overlooked by the court, or that the decision is in conflict with an express statute or a controlling decision overlooked by the court, or to which its attention was not drawn, through the... | |
 | New York (State)., Marcus Tullius Hun - 1881 - 328 str.
...clearly showing either that some question decisive of the case, and "duly submitted by counsel, <** has been overlooked by the court, or that the decision is in conflict with an. express statute or a controlling decision overlooked by the court, or to which its attention was not drawn, through the... | |
 | Theodore Frelinghuysen Cornell Demarest - 1883 - 698 str.
...papers showing clearly that some question decisive of the case, and duly submitted by counsel, has been overlooked by the court; or that the decision...decision, to which the attention of the court was not drawn, through the neglect or inadvertence of counsel." The rule thus promulgated has since been substantially... | |
 | 1895 - 1148 str.
...be made to appear that some question decisive of the cause which was duly submitted by counsel has been overlooked by the court, or that the decision is in conflict with some expressed statute or controlling decision, to which the attention of the court was not called... | |
 | 1891 - 1156 str.
...the motion papers show that some question decisive of the case, and duly submitted by counsel, has been overlooked by the court, or that the decision is in conflict with the statute, or a controlling decision, to which the attention of the court was not called, through... | |
 | 1909 - 1320 str.
...papers showing clearly that some question decisive of the case, and duly submitted by counsel, has been overlooked by the court, or that the decision...an express statute, or with a controlling decision of the Supreme Court, or with a decision of one of the other Courts of Appeals ; and the question so... | |
 | 1902 - 1284 str.
...presented by counsel in their brief, has been overlooked by the court, or that the decision rendered is in conflict with an express statute or with a controlling decision to which the attention of the court has not been directed. Such motion and statement must he Hied within ten days after the delivery of... | |
 | 1890 - 1110 str.
...283. He does not show that any question decisive of the case has been overlooked by the court, nor that the decision is in conflict with an express statute, or with a controlling decision of the court. This is an application to reargne the case upon the points and authorities upon which... | |
| |
... be founded on papers showing clearly that some question decisive of the case, and duly submitted by counsel, has been overlooked by the court... 
