 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1921 - 664 str.
...applying to count No. 2 apply also to this one. and the question of liability under the contract was one of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. As to count No. 4. This raises a different question than that in counts 2, 3, 5 and 6. It is a claim... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, James Dowling, Archer Ryland - 1825 - 866 str.
...after the tithe has been set out, for the tithe-owner to compare his tenth part with the residue, is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the judge. Facey v. Hurdon, 5 G. 4. Page 68 TRESPASS. See APPEAL, 1. — JUSTICES, 1.3. — PLEADING, 5.... | |
 | Francis King Eagle, Edward Younge - 1826 - 534 str.
...after the tithe has been set out, for the tithe-owner to compare his tenth part with the residue, is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the judge.— 5 G. 4. BR Facey v. Hurdom. iii. 1 1 72 CATTLE.— Sec ACISTMENT. 1. Where the plaintiff... | |
 | 1851 - 670 str.
...Darius C, and the prosecutor in evidence stated that his name was Trius C, — Held, that it was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the Court, whether the two words were idem son an ti a. The following is the substance of a CASE stated by the... | |
 | Samuel Niles Sweet - 1843 - 324 str.
...with them. Others make small and comparatively unimportant words too prominent ; thus , " This is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, and if the court resume the responsibility of deciding this question, which belongs to the jury and... | |
 | Samuel Niles Sweet - 1846 - 340 str.
...they with them. Others make small and comparatively unimportant words too prominent; thus, " This is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, and if the court assume the responsibility o/"deciding this question, which belongs to the jury and... | |
 | Edmund Hatch Bennett, Chauncey Smith - 1851 - 680 str.
...Darius C., and tbc prosecutor in evidence stated that his name was Trios C. : — Jleld, that it was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, whether the tiro words were idem sonantia. THE following is the substance of a case stated by the Court... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1862 - 614 str.
...was not in the line of official duty. (2.) Whether paid into the Treasury of the State or not was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the Court ; and the Court erred in regarding it as a question of law alone, and charging upon it as such. 6.... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1906 - 796 str.
...whether the plaintiff was justified in assuming that the car had stopped for her to alight was one of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. This presents the sole question for determination. The ordinance requires that cars shall be stopped... | |
| |
... a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. 
