199590 Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1913, by CENTRAL LAW JOURNAL COMPANY, In the Office of the Librari an of Congress, at Washington. PRINTED BY CENTRAL LAW JOURNAL COMPANY LIST OF No. 1. Beneficial Use as the Basis for Great- er Uniformity of State Laws Governing Water. By Clesson S. Kinney, 3. No. 2. A Plea for the Scientific Preparation of Wills. By Daniel S. Remson, 24. No. 3. In What Spirit Should the Liability Laws be Received. By Axel Teisen, 39. No. 4. The Lawyer and the Legislature. By No. 5. What the New Committee on Uniform Judicial Procedure has Done. By A. H. No. 6. Dicta Et Promissa in the Civil Law No. 7. Eminent Domain with Reference to the Right of the State to Acquire Private Prop- erty for Public Use. By W. C. Rogers, 111. No. 8. Injunction Against Prospective Nuis- No. 9. Oral Modification of Contracts Re- Franchise in Conducting the Busi- ness of Insurance and Regulation of its No. 11. Some Observations on Pleading and Practice. By R. H. Gynne, 183. No. 12. Reforming Procedure-The Great Program of the American Bar Association. No. 13. Courts and Legislation. By Roscoe No. 14. Status of the "Turntable" Doctrine in the United States. By D. Goode Tins- Importance of Bar Association Meet- A Transitional Change-Its Dangers and Demands. By A. H. Robbins, 329. No. 19. Home Rule System of Municipal Gov- ernment-City Sovereignty Versus State Sovereignty. By William K. Klute, 344. The Necessity for the Science of Law. No. 20. The Lawfulness of Agreements in In- demnity Policies Surrendering Control of Defense to Indemnitor-Indemnity Policy Conferring Interest in Suit. By N. C. Col- No. 21. The Power and Place of the Jury Un- der the Recent Amendment to the Oregon Constitution Authorizing Change in Ver- dicts. By Wm. Arthur Terrall, 384. No. 22. Proportional or Percentage Co Insur- ance Clause in Fire Insurance. By Elmer TABLE OF CASES This list includes only those cases commented upon editorially or in our Notes of Impor- Adams Express Co V. Commonwealth (Ken- American Agricultural Chem. Co. V. Berry Athanasaw v. U. S. (U. S. S. C.) The Meaning Atkinson v. Southern Express Co.( South Caro- Bauer & Cie v. O'Donnell (U. S. S. C.) Patents- Beach v. Beach, (Iowa.) Marriage-Liability of Benedum V. First Citizens' Bank (West Vir- Bennett v. U. S. (U. S. S. C.) The Meaning of the Bluefields S. S. Co. v. Lala Ferreras Cangelosi Board of Trustees of the University of Mis- Boggs v. Duncan-Shell Furniture Co. (Iowa.) Bradley v. Richmond (U. S. S. C.) Line of De- Bross v. McNichols (Oregon) Principal and Dow- Brown et ux. v. Brown (South Carolina.) Cohron v. Folk (Missouri.) Confidential Rela- Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Mulkey (Geor- Connors v. Connolly (Connecticut) Monopoly- Using Union Label as a Means to Secure Dailey v. Foster (New Mexico.) Appeal and Error-Substantial Error Affirmed Because Daniel v. Browder Magnet Co. (Georgia.) Venue Day v. Faulks (New Jersey.) Life Estates- Elvins v. Elvins (Missouri.) Remedy in Marital Ex Parte Nelson (Missouri.) Contempt-Publi- |