No. 1. Beneficial Use as the Basis for Great-

er Uniformity of State Laws Governing

Water. By Clesson S. Kinney, 3.

No. 2. A Plea for the Scientific Preparation

of Wills. By Daniel S. Remson, 24.

No. 3. In What Spirit Should the Liability

Laws be Received. By Axel Teisen, 39.

No. 4. The Lawyer and the Legislature. By

Andrew Alexander Bruce, 57.

No. 5. What the New Committee on Uniform

Judicial Procedure has Done. By A. H.

Robbins, 76.

No. 6. Dicta Et Promissa in the Civil Law

and Under Modern Codes. By Axel Teis-

en, 93.

A Transitional Change-Its Dangers

and Demands. By A. H. Robbins, 329.

No. 19. Home Rule System of Municipal Gov-

ernment-City Sovereignty Versus State

Sovereignty. By William K. Klute, 344.

The Necessity for the Science of Law.

By Harvey D. Cheney, 352.

No. 20. The Lawfulness of Agreements in In-

demnity Policies Surrendering Control of

Defense to Indemnitor-Indemnity Policy

Conferring Interest in Suit. By N. C. Col-
lier, 369.

No. 21. The Power and Place of the Jury Un-

der the Recent Amendment to the Oregon

Constitution Authorizing Change in Ver-

dicts. By Wm. Arthur Terrall, 384.

No. 22. Proportional or Percentage Co Insur-

ance Clause in Fire Insurance. By Elmer

404.

R. Richardson,

The Liability of Abstractors of Title.

By Clyde McElmore, 407.

Adams Express Co V.

Commonwealth (Ken-
tucky) The Direct Effect of the Webb-
Kenyon Liquor Act upon Interstate Trans-
portation, Ed. 437.

American Agricultural Chem. Co. V. Berry
(Maine) Bankruptcy-Discharge from debt
Created While Acting "In Any Fiduciary
Capacity," R. D. 146.

Athanasaw v. U. S. (U. S. S. C.) The Meaning
of the White Slave Act as Shown by Federal
Decision, Ed. 261.

Atkinson v. Southern Express Co.( South Caro-
lina) The Effect of the Webb Liquor Act on
Laws Previously Inoperative, Ed. 55.
Baltic Min. Co. v. Massachusetts (U. S. S. C.)
Tax on Interstate Commerce, Ed. 455.
Bankers' Trust Co. V. R. E. Dietz Company
New York) The Rule of Scrip Dividend Go-
ing to Life Tenant Under a Will, Ed. 163.
Barton et al. v. Thaw et al. (Pennsylvania.)
Perpetuitites-Option Indefinite as to Time
of Exercise, R. D. 128.

Bauer & Cie v. O'Donnell (U. S. S. C.) Patents-
Right of the Patentee to Fix Price in Re-
sale of Patented Article, R. D. 74.

Beach v. Beach, (Iowa.) Marriage-Liability of
Third Person Inducing by False Representa-
tion, R. D. 110.

Benedum v. First Citizens' Bank (West Vir-
ginia.) Right of Creditors and Stockhold-
ers in Winding Up Suits of Insolvent Cor-
porations, Ed. 243.

Bennett v. U. S. (U. S. S. C.) The Meaning of the
White Slave Act as Shown by Federal De-
cision, Ed. 261.

Bluefields S. S. Co. v. Lala Ferreras Cangelosi
S. S. Co. et al. (Louisiana.) Corporation-
Director Liability for Diversion by Cor-
poration Acting in Fiduciary Capacity, R.
D. 343.

Board of Trustees of the University of Mis-
sissippi v. Waugh (Mississippi.) Constitu-
tional Law-Statute Abolishing Secret Or-
ders Among University Students, R. D. 219.

Boggs v. Duncan-Shell Furniture Co. (Iowa.)
Colorable Competition for Unlawful Pur-
poses, Ed. 437.

Bradley v. Richmond (U. S. S. C.) Line of De-
marcation in Delegation of Legislative Pow-
er to a Commission and Vesting It With
Administrative Functions, Ed. 73.

Bross v. McNichols (Oregon) Principal and
Surety Rule Strictissimi Juris as Regards
Surety Company, R. D. 262.

Brown et ux. v. Brown (South Carolina.) Dow-
er-Inchoate Right, ann. case, 116.

Bucher v. Moss (U. S. S. C.) Community Rights
in Government Homestead, Ed. 401.
Carlson et al. v. Kres (U. S. S. C.) Banks and
Banking-Special Deposits, ann. case, 373.
Cerchione v. Hunne well et al. (Massachusetts.)
Landlord and Tenant-Nuisance, ann. case,
462.

Cohron v. Folk (Missouri.) Confidential Rela-
tions-Test of Its Existence and Burden of
Proof of Transaction, R. D. 281.

Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Mulkey (Geor-
gia.) Insurance-Condition of Forfeiture in
Premium Note, R. D. 421.

Connors v. Connolly (Connecticut)

Monopoly-

Using Union Label as a Means to Secure
Closed Shops, R. D. 20.

Dailey v. Foster (New Mexico.) Appeal and
Error Substantial Error Affirmed Because
of Non-Observance of Immaterial Techni-
cality, R. D. 244.

Daniel v. Browder Magnet Co. (Georgia.) Venue
Jurisdiction Dependent Upon Bankruptcy of
Joint Defendants, R. D. 402.

Day v. Faulks (New Jersey.) Life Estates-
Stock Dividend Apportioned Between Life
Tenant and Remainderman, R. D. 439.
Desch v. Desch (Colorado.) Divorce-Mainten-
ance of Child, ann. case, 64.

Elvins v. Elvins (Missouri.) Remedy in Marital
Actions Based on Service by Publication,
Ed. 365.

Ex Parte Nelson (Missouri.) Contempt-Publi-
cation Not Accurately Stating Ruling and