 | United States. Supreme Court - 1851 - 714 str.
...acts of the republic of Texas, or the eleventh article aforesaid, at all contravene that provision of the Constitution of the United" States which says, that " no State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts." Now it would seem obvious enough, that laws enacted by... | |
 | Massachusetts constitutional convention, 1853 - 1853 - 814 str.
...and supreme over that institution at Cambridge, except so far as it is limited by that provision of the Constitution of the United States, which says, that no State shall make any " law impairing the obligation of contracts." Therefore, if there be any doubt about the power... | |
 | Massachusetts. Constitutional Convention, Harvey Fowler - 1853 - 814 str.
...and supreme over that institution at Cambridge, except so far as it is limited by that provision of the Constitution of the United States, •which says, that no State shall make any " law impairing the obligation of contracts." Therefore, if there be any doubt about the power... | |
 | Sir Edward Clarke - 1874 - 410 str.
...court that the New York statute was unconstitutional, as being in violation of Article 1, § 10, of the Constitution of the United States, which says that no State shall enter into any agreement or compact with another State or with a foreign power. The State could not... | |
 | 1882 - 1916 str.
...strict accordance with this provision is in violation of that provision of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States which says that no "state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law," and is therefore void.... | |
 | Lorenzo Smith Boswell Sawyer, United States. Circuit Court (9th Circuit) - 1882 - 718 str.
...Sayka v. OCR Co., 31. 2. IMPORTS — CONSTITUTION. — The word "imports," as used in that clause of the constitution of the United States which says that " no state shall levy any imposts or duties on imports or exports," does not apply to articles carried from one state... | |
 | 1885 - 892 str.
...the sole ground that the statute of the state which authorizes it is repugnant to that provision of the constitution of the United States which says that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. Such proceedings were had in the inferior courts of New... | |
 | Sir Edward Clarke - 1888 - 570 str.
...York statute was unconstitutional, as being in violation of * See ante, p. 64. Article 1, § 10, of the Constitution of the United States, which says that no State shall enter into any agreement or compact with another State or with a foreign power. The State could not... | |
 | Iowa. Treasury Dept - 1899 - 390 str.
...General Assembly, was invalid and of no effect because in contravention of the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which says, that no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law, and also of section 9,... | |
 | Jeremiah Smith - 1902 - 768 str.
...the sole ground that the statute of the State, which authorizes it, is repugnant to that provision of the Constitution of the United States which says that no State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. Such proceedings were had in the inferior courts of New... | |
| |
State, which authorizes it, is repugnant to that provision of the Constitution of the United States which says that no State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. 
