 Such a guarantee has obviously rather the character of a moral sanction to the arrangements which it defends than that of a contingent liability to make war. It would, no doubt, give a right to make war, but it would not necessarily impose the obligation.  The Yale Review - Strana 478upravili: - 1915Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | William Edward Hall - 1880 - 776 str.
...PART II. we are, decline to join, we are not bound single-handed to ^]_ x ' make up the def1ciency. Such a guarantee has obviously rather the character...liability to make war. It would no doubt give a right to make war, but would not necessarily impose the obligation V It is in favour of the latter construction... | |
 | Albin Body - 1882 - 470 str.
...certain, that there will be «no violation of neutrality. If they, situated exactly as we are, de«cline to join, we are not bound singlehanded to make up...contingent liability to make war. It would no doubt «give us a right to make war, but it would not necessarily impose «the obligation. That would be a question... | |
 | Jan Helenus Ferguson - 1884 - 818 str.
...situated exactly as we are. decline to join, we are not bound single-handed to make up the. deficiency. Such a guarantee has obviously rather the character...liability to make war. It would no doubt give a right to make war, but would not necessarily impose the obligation.* It is in favour of the latter construction... | |
 | Jan Helenus Ferguson - 1884 - 754 str.
...to join, we are not bound single-handed to make up the deficiency. Such a guarantee has obviou sly rather the character of a moral sanction to the arrangements...liability to make war. It would no doubt give a right to make war, but would not necessarily impose the obligation. * It is in favour of the latter construction... | |
 | Association for the Reform and Codification of the Law of Nations. Conference - 1886 - 214 str.
...would no doubt give us the right to make war, but it would not necessarily impose the obligation; it has obviously rather the character of a moral sanction...which it defends, than that of a contingent liability. Now, putting aside the undoubted fact, that international treaties are concluded to give, not moral,... | |
 | Leo de Hartog - 1892 - 856 str.
...certain, that there will be no violation of neutrality. If they, situated exactly as we are, decline to join, we are not bound singlehanded to make up the deficiencies of the rest. Such a guarantee hae4lbvionsly rather the character of a moral sanction to the arrangements which it defends, than that... | |
 | Sir Spencer Walpole - 1904 - 556 str.
...certain that there will be no violation of neutrality. If they, situated exactly as we are, decline to join, we are not bound singlehanded to make up...liability to make war. It would no doubt give a right to make war, but it would not necessarily impose the obligation.' 1 These remarks, not unnaturally,... | |
 | 1917 - 962 str.
...to join, we are not bound single handed to make up for the deficiencies of the rest. Such a guaranty has obviously rather the character of a moral sanction...that of a contingent liability to make war. It would be a question to consider when the occasion arose. The House would be the judge as to whether such... | |
 | Alexander Fuehr - 1915 - 226 str.
...certain that there will be no violation of neutrality. If they, situated exactly as we are, decline to join, we are not bound single-handed to make up...liability to make war. It would no doubt give a right to make war, but it would not necessarily impose the obligation. "Take an instance from what we have... | |
 | Charles Percy Sanger, Henry Tertius James Norton - 1915 - 176 str.
...it is certain there will be no violation of neutrality. If they, situated exactly as we are, decline to join, we are not bound single-handed to make up the deficiencies of the rest. . . ." " It would give a right to make war, but not necessarily impose the obligation." Lord Derby's... | |
| |
