Case dismissed on ground that cause of action has abated. Florida ex rel. Vars v. Knott, 506.
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES. See Interstate Commerce Acts,
1. Administrative Practice and Regulations. Validity and effect in construction of Revenue Acts. Estate of Sanford v. Commis- sioner, 39; Rasquin v. Humphreys, 54.
2. Id. When Treasury Regulations not folicwed. Haggar Co. v. Helvering, 389.
Appointment of Director and Assistant Director of Administra- tive Office of United States Courts, pp. 641, 642.
Collision. Fault. Validity and construction of rules of Board of Supervising Inspectors; crossing courses. Postal S. S. Corp. v. El Isleo, 378.
ADVERSE CLAIMANTS. See Interpleader.
AGENTS. See Constitutional Law, V, (A), 8; Venue, 3. AGRICULTURAL MARKETING AGREEMENT ACT. See Anti- trust Acts.
ALLOTMENTS. See Indians.
ANTITRUST ACTS. See Jurisdiction, II, 21.
Sherman Act. Combination and Conspiracy. Marketing of Agricultural Commodities. Operation of Sherman Act as affected by Agricultural Marketing Agreement and Capper-Volstead Acts; effect of inaction, or limited action, by Secretary of Agriculture; agreements of producers, distributors and others restricting inter- state commerce in milk violated Act. United States v. Borden Co., 188.
Question of assumption of risk properly submitted to jury. Keys v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 529.
ATTORNEYS. See Constitutional Law, V, (A), 11.
Appointment by Court. Connor v. California, 530. AUTOMOBILES. See Bankruptcy, 2.
BANKRUPTCY. See Constitutional Law, I, 4.
1. Claims. Validity and Priority. Bankruptcy court exercises equity powers in passing on claims; validity or priority of claim underlying judgment of state court; claim as affected by duty of dominant or controlling stockholder. Pepper v. Litton, 295.
2. Id. Penalties for nonpayment of automobile license taxes, which accrued when business was operated by trustee in bank- ruptcy, allowable against bankrupt estate; construction of Act of June 18, 1934. Boteler v. Ingels, 57.
3. Farmers. Effect of filing of petition under § 75 of Act on state court's jurisdiction over pending foreclosure proceeding. Kalb v. Feuerstein, 433.
4. Id. Procedure and relief under § 75 subsection (s) of farmer- debtor failing to obtain acceptance of composition or extension proposal. John Hancock Ins. Co. v. Bartels, 180.
5. Reorganization Proceeding Under §77. When court without power to order discontinuance of local transportation service. Palmer v. Massachusetts, 79.
6. Reorganization Proceeding Under $77B. Reorganization plan as "fair and equitable"; priority of creditors over stockholders; participation by stockholders in plan of reorganization of insolvent debtor; effect of failure to accept plan. Case v. Los Angeles Lum- ber Products Co., 106.
BANKS. See Constitutional Law, Y, (A), 9.
BOARD OF TAX APPEALS. See Taxation, I–II.
Nature of Proceedings. Findings. Proceedings before Board are equitable in nature; conclusiveness of findings. Helvering v. Lazarus& Co., 252.
Effect of Project. Rights of Landowners. Lands within area not "taken" by program under Mississippi River Flood Control Act. United States v. Sponenbarger, 256.
What Law Governs. Federal court must follow local law as
to burden of proof on issue of bona fide purchase of land. Cities Service Co. v. Dunlap, 208.
BRIEFS. See Jurisdiction, III, 4.
CANVASSING. See Constitutional Law, V, (A), 6.
CAPITAL STOCK TAX. See Taxation, II, 8.
CAPPER-VOLSTEAD ACT. See Antitrust Acts.
CARRIERS. See Bankruptcy, 5; Constitutional Law, II, 1-3; III, 3-4; Interstate Commerce Acts.
CENSORSHIP. See Constitutional Law, V, (A), 6.
See Labor Relations Act, 6.
CERTIORARI. See Jurisdiction, II, 10-11; Procedure, 3.
CIRCULARS. See Constitutional Law, V, (A), 2–5.
CITIZENS. See Constitutional Law, I, 6; IV; Jurisdiction, II, 2.
CLAIMS. See Contracts, 1.
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. See Labor Relations Act, 1-4, 6-7. COLLISION. See Admiralty.
COMBINATION. See Antitrust Acts; Patents for Inventions, 3. COMMUNICATIONS ACT.
1. Wire Tapping. Evidence. Sec. 605 bars use in federal courts of evidence obtained by interception of intrastate telephone com- munication; under circumstances here, divulgence not "authorized by sender." Weiss v. U. S., 321.
2. Id. Not only intercepted communications themselves, but also evidence procured through use thereof inadmissible; accused entitled to opportunity to prove that case against him was tainted with illicit wire-tapping. Nardone v. U. S., 338.
COMPANY UNION. See Labor Relations Act, 1-4.
COMPOSITION. See Bankruptcy, 4.
COMPROMISE. See Procedure, 5.
CONDEMNATION. See Eminent Domain.
CONSENT. See Jurisdiction, IV, 5.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. See Judgments, 2-3, 5; Jurisdiction,
I. Miscellaneous, p. 792.
II. Commerce Clause, p. 792. III. Fifth Amendment, p. 793. IV. Eleventh Amendment, p. 793. V. Fourteenth Amendment.
(A) Due Process Clause, p. 794.
(B) Equal Protection Clause, p. 794.
1. Federal Instrumentality. Immunity from State Taxation. Mortgages taken by Home Owners' Loan Corporation immune from Maryland tax. Pittman v. Home Owners' Loan Corp., 21.
2. Id. Corporation operating bath house in Hot Springs Na- tional Park not exempt from Social Security Act as "instrumentality of United States," and was taxable under Arkansas Unemployment Compensation Law. Buckstaff Co. v. McKinley, 358.
3. Powers of Congress. Creation of corporation to facilitate performance of governmental function; protection of operations of agency. Pittman v. Home Owners' Loan Corp., 21.
4. Id. Bankruptcy Powers. Power of Congress to void fore- closure proceedings in state court after filing of petition for com- position or extension under § 75 of Bankruptcy Act. Kalb v. Feuerstein, 433.
5. Judicial Power. Distribution of jurisdiction of this Court in cases where State is a party. Massachusetts v. Missouri, 1.
6. Id. Judicial power over controversies "between citizens of different States" authorized interpleader jurisdiction where com- plainant was citizen of same State as one of adverse claimants between whom diversity existed. Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co., 66.
7. Powers of States. Intoxicating Liquors. Scope of power of States to regulate transportation; limitation of transportation to licensed common carriers. Ziffrin v. Reeves, 132.
1. Powers of Congress. Railroads. Authorization to Interstate Commerce Commission to impose conditions regarding compensa- tion of employees in order approving lease, valid. U. S. v. Lowden,
2. Id. Communications. Statute barring from federal court evi- dence obtained by interception of telephone communications not limited to interstate communications. Weiss v. U. S., 321.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.-Continued.
3. State Regulation. Intoxicating Liquors. Power of State to regulate traffic in intoxicating liquors; statute forbidding trans- portation of intoxicating liquors by others than licensed common carriers, valid. Ziffrin, Inc. v. Reeves, 132,
4. Id. Foreign Corporations. State may condition doing of local business on designation of agent for service of process. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Corp., 165.
5. State Taxation. Ratio of gross receipts from local business to entire gross receipts as measure of privilege tax on capital stock, etc., sustained. Ford Motor Co. v. Beauchamp, 331.
1. Eminent Domain. What Constitutes Taking. Flood Control Projects. Land in area of projected Boeuf Floodway not "taken"; compensation not required to be paid to landowner for flood dam- age not caused by Government. United States v. Sponenbarger, 256.
2. Id. Just Compensation determined as of time of taking; time of payment of money award as time of taking under Flood Con- trol Act; no interest accrues before taking. Danforth v. U. S., 271.
3. Due Process. Railroads. Requirement of Interstate Com- merce Commission order authorizing railroad lease, that part of savings be devoted to compensate loss to affected employees, valid. United States v. Lowden, 225.
4. Due Process. Pipeline Companies. Order of Interstate Com- merce Commission requiring oil company, piping oil interstate to its own refineries, to furnish valuation data, sustained; question whether regulation of company's rates would deprive it of due process not presented. Valvoline Oil Co. v. United States, 141.
5. Judicial Powers. Due process not infringed by withholding from court jurisdiction which it never possessed. American Fed- eration of Labor v. Labor Board, 401.
6. Notice and Hearing. Failure of Circuit Court of Appeals to remand case for new trial, and its giving judgment absolute upon reversal of District Court, did not deprive defendant of day in court. Helis v. Ward, 365.
Suit Against State by Citizen of Other State. Joinder of state court judge and officer as defendants. Treinies v. Sunshine Min- ing Co., 66.
« PředchozíPokračovat » |