Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub

CHAPTER V-COURTS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AND THE
CITY OF LOUISVILLE.

CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Factors in the Criminal Court System.

The Grand Jury

Successful Criminal Court Reform.

CIVIL JUSTICE

Justices' Courts

The County Court.

The Circuit Court..

Page

479

479

479

480

481

482

482

483

483

484

487

NEED FOR UNIFICATION.

CHAPTER VI-THE BAR...

IMPORTANCE OF THE BAR IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM.. 487 PREPARATION FOR THE BAR....

[blocks in formation]

THE DOUBLE SYSTEM OF PROSECUTORS IN KENTUCKY 500

OTHER FAULTS IN THE PRESENT SYSTEM..

THE FEE SYSTEM...

THE BASIS OF AN IMPROVED SYSTEM.

A Plan for Unification Proposed..

Removal of County Attorneys..

CHAPTER VIII-JUDICIAL PROCEDURE.

MEASURES TO SIMPLIFY CIVIL PROCEDURE.

Declaratory Judgments

Commercial Arbitration

RESTORATION OF THE RULE-MAKING POWER TO THE

COURTS

Objections to Legislated Procedure.
Advantages of Court Rule Procedure.

The Two Systems in Actual Practice.

NEEDED REFORMS IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

The Grand Jury..

The Petit Jury

Witness Fees

502

503

504

505_

505

507

507

509

510

511

512

514

516

517

. 519

519

520

522

522

523

CHAPTER IX-UNIFICATION OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM..
IMPORTANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS OF THE
JUDICIARY

The Need for Records and Data.

Futile Past Efforts to Improve Administrative Efficiency.. 524
Organization of Judiciary for Administrative Work..
Successful Reorganization of the Federal Courts..
Judicial Reorganization in Ohio....

[blocks in formation]

COSTS AND SAVINGS UNDER JUDICIAL COUNCIL PLAN 531 CHAPTER X-SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS.

[blocks in formation]

APPENDIX A-DRAFT OF MODEL BILL RELATING TO JUDI-
CIAL RULE-MAKING POWER..

538

The Judiciary of Kentucky

CHAPTER I

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM

In the United States the administration of justice is far more a state than a national function. Comparatively little jurisdiction is conferred upon the United States courts. Every state has set up its own system to administer justice under its own body of laws. At the time when state systems were being established, conditions of living and doing business, in all of the newer states, at least, were similar, and so a fairly uniform system is found in all the states from the Alleghenies to the Pacific. These states were mainly agricultural, having a small population scattered over a large area, and the judicial machine was designed to fit the prevailing conditions.

Three main needs were met by the typical arrangement of courts:*

1. A court of minor jurisdiction within easy reach of every citizen and available at all times. For the enforcement of criminal law these local courts must be at all times accessible; even for small civil actions it was important that they should be reached without long travel because undue expense would defeat justice. To supply this need the justice of the peace courts were established.

2. A court of general trial jurisdiction for every county so that no citizen would be required to travel beyond the confines of his county to defend his rights. Since the average county could not afford more than a few weeks' business each year for such a court, the counties were grouped together to form a circuit, with a common judge.

3. An appellate court to make the law uniform throughout the state and to correct the mistakes of the trial courts.

*Roscoe Pound: The Organization of Courts. Proc. Minn. State Bar Ass'n, 1914; Am. Jud. Soc. Bul. VI.

In most states also the administration of decedents' estates is done with the county as the unit and a special court exists for this purpose, known variously as the Surrogate's Court, Probate Court, or County Court. Sometimes this special court exercises also general civil and criminal jurisdiction to a limited extent. Various other courts have been created, especially in cities, and usually in response to the need for increasing the capacity for work, or to relieve some of the older courts. In some states the original simple system has become extremely complex.

The need for special city courts is met in the Kentucky Constitution and statutes so that no town of 250 inhabitants or more need be without its special localized court. In the larger cities this municipal court is given somewhat increased powers but nowhere is it to be considered a real infringement upon the symmetry of the original pattern. It is mainly the court of a city magistrate, or justice, in the larger places holding court in continuous sessions and so always available.

The Minor Courts:

In this State there are from three to eight magistrates or justices in every county, each elected in a specially designated district to serve for four years and to be paid by fees. Their jurisdiction is countywide and extends in civil cases to those involving $100 and in criminal cases to those in which a maximum punishment is not greater than 50 days' imprisonment or $100 fine. In cities of the first three classes the Police Court has no civil jurisdiction, but in the fourth and fifth classes, and in towns exceeding 250 persons in the sixth class, the Police Court has civil jurisdiction corresponding to that of the Justice of the Peace. It has jurisdiction over municipal ordinance cases which is withheld from Justices.

The work of these Justices consists mainly in:

1. The trial of civil cases with or without a jury.

2. Conducting a preliminary examination to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that an accused

« PředchozíPokračovat »