United States Supreme Court Reports, Svazek 22Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1885 Complete with headnotes, summaries of decisions, statements of cases, points and authorities of counsel, annotations, tables, and parallel references. |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 82
Strana 47
... cause came on to be heard on the tran- script of the record from the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee , and was argued by counsel ; on consideration whereof , it is now here ordered , adjudged and decreed by this court , that the ...
... cause came on to be heard on the tran- script of the record from the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee , and was argued by counsel ; on consideration whereof , it is now here ordered , adjudged and decreed by this court , that the ...
Strana 48
... cause was removed here the losing party assigns a single cause of error , which is that the circuit court erred in refusing to rule in favor of the defendant upon the ques- tions of law as requested , and in ruling to the contrary ...
... cause was removed here the losing party assigns a single cause of error , which is that the circuit court erred in refusing to rule in favor of the defendant upon the ques- tions of law as requested , and in ruling to the contrary ...
Strana 68
... cause from State to United States Court , after new trial granted in State Court -Act constitutional . 1. Where a cause is removed from a State Court to the Circuit Court of the United States , the Act of Congress expressly requires the ...
... cause from State to United States Court , after new trial granted in State Court -Act constitutional . 1. Where a cause is removed from a State Court to the Circuit Court of the United States , the Act of Congress expressly requires the ...
Strana 69
... cause was out of the Common Pleas , and in the Circuit Court . The former had jurisdic- tion to remit and the latter to receive it . Being in the latter , that court had jurisdiction to re- tain it . If there were error on the part of ...
... cause was out of the Common Pleas , and in the Circuit Court . The former had jurisdic- tion to remit and the latter to receive it . Being in the latter , that court had jurisdiction to re- tain it . If there were error on the part of ...
Strana 71
... cause of action , unless the record would be inclusive upon an action upon the judgment in the State in which it was ren- The decision of the court below , excluding the evidence offered to contradict the record of the Indiana Court ...
... cause of action , unless the record would be inclusive upon an action upon the judgment in the State in which it was ren- The decision of the court below , excluding the evidence offered to contradict the record of the Indiana Court ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
United States Supreme Court Reports, Svazek 12,Svazky 46–49 United States. Supreme Court Úplné zobrazení - 1901 |
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
19 Wall Act of Congress action affirmed agent alleged amount appears applied assignment attorney authority Bank Bankrupt bill bonds bottomry cause charge Circuit Court City claim collision common law complainant Constitution construction contract corporation County coupons court of equity creditors debt decided decision declared decree deed defendant in error delivered the opinion district court Dubuque equity evidence executed fact fat liquor filed fire-pot glycerine heat held interest invention issued John Slidell judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land Legislature libel lien maritime lien ment Messrs mortgage officers owner paid parties patent payable payment person plaintiff in error Poncin port proceedings proper purpose question Railroad Company record rule schooner Stat statute Statute of Limitations steamer suit Supreme Court T. E. Brown tion United valid vessel void writ of error
Oblíbené pasáže
Strana 368 - Wisconsin into the Union as a State, It was enacted that the Mississippi and other rivers bordering on said State, ''and the navigable waters leading into the same, shall be common highways, and forever free, as well to the inhabitants of said State as to all other citizens of the United States, without any
Strana 429 - That, whenever by priority of possession rights to the use of water for mining, agricultural, manufacturing or other purposes, have vested and accrued, and the same are recognized and acknowledged by the local customs, laws and decisions of courts, the possessors and owners of such vested rights shall be maintained and protected in the same.
Strana 186 - of the United States to three classes of cases : 1. Where there has been misbehavior of a person In the presence of the court, or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice ; 2. Where there has been misbehavior of any officer of the courts In
Strana 411 - drawn In question the validity of a statute >f. or an authority exercised under any state, on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States, and the decision Is In favor of such their validity
Strana 420 - jurisdiction of the case, and not merely of a question in it. The Act of 1867 and the 25th section of the Judiciary Act both provide that a final judgment or decree in any suit in the highest court of a State where is drawn in question certain things relating to the Constitution or laws of the United
Strana 426 - vested and accrued, and the same are recognized and acknowledged by the local customs, laws and decisions of courts, the possessors and owners of such vested rights shall be maintained and protected in the same." the customary law, with respect to the use of water, which
Strana 89 - may be re-examined and reversed or affirmed in the Supreme Court of the United States by writ of error or appeal, and though the sum limiting this jurisdiction has been increased to $1,000, this statute remains the sole rule governing the right of appeal in all other respects. •In the case of
Strana 409 - In the later law there is substituted the following description: "Or where any title, right, privilege or immunity is claimed under the Constitution, or any treaty or statute of or commission held or authority exercised under the United States," etc. The earlier law describes and includes only
Strana 420 - and the decision is adverse to such Constitution, laws or rights, may be re-examined and reversed or affirmed in the Supreme Court of the United States upon a writ of error. Had the original Act stopped here there could have been no difficulty. This Act derives
Strana 350 - said that it was conceded that war gives to the sovereign full right to take the persons and confiscate the property of the enemy wherever found, and observed that the mitigations of this rigid rule, which the humane and wise policy of modern times has introduced into practice, might more or