District of Columbia Appropriations, Díl 1U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979 |
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
11 REGULAR PAY additional Advisory Neighborhood Commissions Amount Positions Amount APPROPRIATED BUDGET APPROPRIATED FUNDS Arlington County assessment audit AVERAGE FULL-TIME EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS Board Budget Budget Building CAPITAL BUDGET AUTHORITY CATEGORY CETA Chairman Charles County City Council COLUMBIA FY GOVERNMENT COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT FY Commission Committee Congress costs County D. C. funds D.C. General Hospital Department District Government District of Columbia employees EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY Environmental Services equipment Estimated exempt EXPENDITURES Federal grants Federal payment fiscal year 1980 functions FUNDS & EMPLOYMENT FY GOVERNMENT 80 Improvements income level income tax increase Lapse Number legislative Loudoun County Mayor ment Metropolitan million Montgomery County Non-Add NON-DISTRICT OBLIGATIONS FY OBMS Office OPERATING BUDGET percent personnel Police Positions Amount Positions Project under design property tax Public public housing REIMBURSEMENTS rent rental revenue RUDD sales tax SCHEDULE School staff Street Sub-Total tax burden vehicle Washington Washington Aqueduct WILSON
Oblíbené pasáže
Strana 22 - To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding 10 miles square) as may, by cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the Government of the United States...
Strana 1201 - While away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Commission, members of the Commission shall be allowed...
Strana 18 - It shall be the duty of the Mayor ... to develop meaningful intercity expenditure and revenue comparisons based on data supplied by the Bureau of the Census, and to identify elements of costs and benefits to the District which result from the unusual role of the District as the Nation's Capital.
Strana 72 - Mr. Chairman, at this point, I would like to introduce into the record a statement from the Consumer Federation of America, which is on the bill where it expresses — "express our opposition to HR 5491...
Strana 23 - The Federal contribution was made in the form of lump sum annual authorizations and appropriations that bore no consistent relationship to either expenditures or revenues. This lump sum approach was made permanent by the DC Revenue Act of 1939; since its implementaion, payments have varied between 8.5 and 30 percent of District expenditures.
Strana 44 - Washington metropolitan area will receive an estimated $144 million in welfare payments. The District accounts for the bulk of the area's caseload and expenditure, and in fact, has more recipients and larger expenditures for welfare than all other area governments combined. The welfare burden falls disproportionately on the central city because a far higher percentage of the population is enrolled in welfare programs, and because the city alone must bear the full non.federal cost of the programs...
Strana 32 - Federal land holdings amount to 41 .6 percent of all land after streets and alleys have been excluded (A detailed breakdown of this information is provided in the Appendix.) The tax loss due to Federal exemptions is placed at $136.9 million for FY 1979, up more than $9 million (7%) from last year's total.
Strana 52 - ... range of the metropolitan area jurisdictions. Higher real estate tax burdens in the District are chiefly caused by higher property values in the central city where land is relatively scarce and commuting distances considerably shorter. District sales and use taxes are slightly above the suburban average while automobile taxes (eg, motor vehicle registration fees, personal property taxes, and gasoline taxesl fall below the average of other jurisdictions in the metropolitan area.
Strana 32 - Approximately $3.0 million of the tax loss would also be exempt from property taxation in any community in the nation by Act of Congress (PL. 846, 77th Congress). REAL ESTATE IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA - FY...
Strana 27 - ... benefits of Federal grants-in-aid relative to aid given other States and local governments; (8) recurring and nonrecurring costs of unreimbursed services rendered the District by the Federal Government; and (9) relative tax burden on District residents compared to that of residents in other jurisdictions in the Washington, District of Columbia, metropolitan area and in other cities of comparable size.