 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1856 - 814 str.
...is the duty of courts judicially to know the general course of the transactions of human life, and whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction ; eg, the peculiar nature of lotteries, and the mode in which they are generally carried on. Salomon... | |
 | United States. Department of the Interior - 1867 - 460 str.
...public history affecting the whole people," " public matters affecting the government of the country," " of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction," &c., &c., the courts jndicially take notice of without proof, and, "where the memory of the jndge is... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1868 - 730 str.
...law would be that it should be threshed and delivered in a reasonable time. Courts will judicially take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. See 1 Greenl. Ev. p. 9. The courts will then judicially take notice of the time when the crops mature.... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1864 - 1314 str.
...railroad trains. The rule of law on this subject is well stated in 1 Greenl. Ev. § 6, as follows : " Courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction." In the cases above cited, it ought to be known by all persons who have anything to do with railroad... | |
 | Simon Greenleaf - 1866 - 756 str.
...the nature and extent of the jurisdiction of the inferior court whose judgment it revises.4 In fine, courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. In all these, and the like cases, where the memory of the judge is at fault, he resorts to such documents... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Joel Tiffany - 1868 - 1050 str.
...resignation of a senator of the United States ; the appointment of a cabinet or foreign minister. " In fine, Courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. In all these and the like cases, where the memory of the Judge is at fault, he resorts to such documents... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Erasmus Peshine Smith, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Joel Tiffany, Samuel Hand - 1870 - 704 str.
...proof of their authentication. The rule mentioned by Greenleaf on this subject, is stated to be, that " courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction." (1 Greenleaf on Evidence, § 6, p.10 ; Smith v. NT Central It. R. Co., 43 Barb., 225, 231 ; Swinnerton... | |
 | 1870 - 590 str.
...v. Hoffman, 55 Barb., EVIDENCE. I. Judicial Notice. 1. Under the rule that courts will take judicial notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction, the courts of this State will take judicial notice, that the western portion of its territory was,... | |
 | Marcus Tullius Hun - 1875 - 902 str.
...authority to sustain it. The furthest that the courts have ever gone in that direction, has been to take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction ; * and whether a certain street in a large city is likely to be deserted at nine o'clock in the evening,... | |
 | Simon Greenleaf - 1876 - 762 str.
...the nature and extent of the jurisdiction of the inferior court whose judgment it revises.4 In fine, courts will generally take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction.6 In all these, and the like cases, where the memory of the judge is at fault, he resorts... | |
| |
This is a matter of common knowledge, and "courts will generally take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. 
