 one person of whom it might be said with some approach to certainty that by him the car would not be used. Yet the defendant would have us say that he was the one person whom it was under a legal duty to protect. The law does not lead us to so inconsequent...  American Law Reports Annotated - Strana 591926Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | Charles Albert Keigwin - 1920 - 562 str.
...Devlin vs. Smith supplied the scaffold for use by the servants of the owner. The dealer was indeed the one person of whom it might be said with some approach...does not lead us to so inconsequent a conclusion. Precedents drawn from the days of travel by stagecoach do not lit the conditions of travel today. The... | |
 | Richard A. Posner - 1993 - 168 str.
...devoted to analysis of precedents, and only once does he turn practical: "The dealer was indeed the one person of whom it might be said with some approach...person whom it was under a legal duty to protect." This is not so weird as Cardozo makes it sound. The dealer warrants the safety of the automobile to... | |
 | Lawrence M. Solan - 2010 - 231 str.
...injuries. In arguing against the application of the general rule, Cardozo wrote: The dealer was indeed the one person of whom it might be said with some approach...does not lead us to so inconsequent a conclusion. Precedents drawn from the days of travel by stagecoach do not fit the conditions of travel to-day.... | |
 | Carlos Peregrín Otero - 1994 - 492 str.
...injuries. In arguing against the application of the general rule, Cardozo wrote: The dealer was indeed the one person of whom it might be said with some approach...does not lead us to so inconsequent a conclusion. Precedents drawn from the days of travel by stagecoach do not fit the conditions of travel to-day.... | |
 | Benjamin Nathan Cardozo - 1999 - 462 str.
...Devlin v. Smith supplied the scaffold for use by the servants of the owner. The dealer was indeed the one person of whom it might be said with some approach to certainty that by frim the car would not be used. Yet the defendant would have us say that he was the one person whom... | |
 | Martin P. Golding - 2001 - 180 str.
...Devlin v. Smith supplied the scaffold for use by the servants of the owner. The dealer was indeed the one person of whom it might be said with some approach...whom it was under a legal duty to protect. The law docs not lead us to so inconsequent a conclusion. Precedents drawn from the days of travel by stage... | |
 | C. Reed, Timothy Norman - 2003 - 270 str.
...technicalities of law and precedent to a larger common-sense perspective: The [car] dealer was indeed the one person of whom it might be said with some approach...him the car would not be used. Yet the defendant, Buick Motor Co., would have us say that he was the one person whom it was under a legal duty to protect.... | |
| |
