Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 41U.S. Department of Labor, Employees' Compensation Appeals Board., 1989 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 64
Strana 93
... 29 , 1987 , the Office requested appellant to submit additional information in support of her claim , including a ... April 25 , 1988 , an Office medical adviser COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD DECISIONS 93 គ ន ន ន ន 29 30 30.
... 29 , 1987 , the Office requested appellant to submit additional information in support of her claim , including a ... April 25 , 1988 , an Office medical adviser COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD DECISIONS 93 គ ន ន ន ន 29 30 30.
Strana 99
... April 29 , 1988 , Dr. Stein stated : 3 " In regard to this patient and relative to the outline of information , we would state the date of maximum improvement relative to this patient's activities would have been approximately April 1 ...
... April 29 , 1988 , Dr. Stein stated : 3 " In regard to this patient and relative to the outline of information , we would state the date of maximum improvement relative to this patient's activities would have been approximately April 1 ...
Strana 100
... April 27 , 1988 Dr. Stein established that there is full range of motion ... April 17 , 1988 Dr. Stein states the surgery consisted of arthrotomy and ... 29 , 1988 report , Dr. Stein did not provide goniometric measurements , or ...
... April 27 , 1988 Dr. Stein established that there is full range of motion ... April 17 , 1988 Dr. Stein states the surgery consisted of arthrotomy and ... 29 , 1988 report , Dr. Stein did not provide goniometric measurements , or ...
Strana 101
... April 29 , 1988 report , Dr. Stein noted appellant had an active range of motion on initial examination from five degrees to 95 to 100 degrees - and he did not provide rationale for his estimate of the percentage of impairment . ' The ...
... April 29 , 1988 report , Dr. Stein noted appellant had an active range of motion on initial examination from five degrees to 95 to 100 degrees - and he did not provide rationale for his estimate of the percentage of impairment . ' The ...
Strana 117
... April 29 , 1985 , Dr. Sheffel advised the Office that it appeared that on September 4 , 1984 appellant aggravated an underlying back condition . On May 29 , 1985 , an Office medical adviser reviewed the medical evidence of record and ...
... April 29 , 1985 , Dr. Sheffel advised the Office that it appeared that on September 4 , 1984 appellant aggravated an underlying back condition . On May 29 , 1985 , an Office medical adviser reviewed the medical evidence of record and ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accepted activities additional advised aggravation alleged amount appellant appellant submitted appellant's appellant's claim application August authority basis benefits Board Board finds Board-certified causally related caused claim claimant compensation concluded condition considered continued December decision denied Department determined disability disease duty ECAB employee employing establishment employment employment injury entitled establishment evaluation examination fact factors February Federal filed finds follows further Guides hearing impairment indicated injury issue January July June knee lant letter dated lifting limitation loss March matter medical evidence ment merit myocardial infarction noted notice November October Office of Workers Office's opinion overpayment pain patient payment percent performance period permanent physical physician position Post Office present prior Procedure reasons received reconsideration record referred relationship relevant remanded request result schedule award September shows specific statement submitted sustained tion treatment