Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 41U.S. Department of Labor, Employees' Compensation Appeals Board., 1989 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 96
... Board notes that the Office may not merely review the evidence of record and arrive at a different conclusion from the initial adjudicating claims examiner and satisfy its burden of proof . Therefore , the Board finds that the Office ...
... Board notes that the Office may not merely review the evidence of record and arrive at a different conclusion from the initial adjudicating claims examiner and satisfy its burden of proof . Therefore , the Board finds that the Office ...
Strana 97
... Board to determine whether the Office abused its discretion in refusing to reopen appellant's case for review on the merits pursuant to section 8128 of the Federal Employees ' Compensation Act . However , the Board notes that the ...
... Board to determine whether the Office abused its discretion in refusing to reopen appellant's case for review on the merits pursuant to section 8128 of the Federal Employees ' Compensation Act . However , the Board notes that the ...
Strana 144
... notes covering the period June 2 , 1985 to August 16 , 1988. Appellant also submitted Dr. Auger's treatment notes for the period August 26 , 1988 to October 11 , 1988. In his treatment notes for October 11 , 1988 , Dr. Auger stated in ...
... notes covering the period June 2 , 1985 to August 16 , 1988. Appellant also submitted Dr. Auger's treatment notes for the period August 26 , 1988 to October 11 , 1988. In his treatment notes for October 11 , 1988 , Dr. Auger stated in ...
Strana 146
... Board notes that on appeal , appellant submitted a May 24 , 1989 report of Dr. Auger . The Board may not consider this evidence in its review of appellant's case on appeal . Pursuant to its Rules of Procedure , the Board's jurisdiction ...
... Board notes that on appeal , appellant submitted a May 24 , 1989 report of Dr. Auger . The Board may not consider this evidence in its review of appellant's case on appeal . Pursuant to its Rules of Procedure , the Board's jurisdiction ...
Strana 155
... notes of discussions with appellant regarding his performance . These notes show that appellant was advised on November 26 , 1985 that unless his performance improved tremendously within the next 30 days he would not be upgraded after ...
... notes of discussions with appellant regarding his performance . These notes show that appellant was advised on November 26 , 1985 that unless his performance improved tremendously within the next 30 days he would not be upgraded after ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accepted activities additional advised aggravation alleged amount appellant appellant submitted appellant's appellant's claim application August authority basis benefits Board Board finds Board-certified causally related caused claim claimant compensation concluded condition considered continued December decision denied Department determined disability disease duty ECAB employee employing establishment employment employment injury entitled establishment evaluation examination fact factors February Federal filed finds follows further Guides hearing impairment indicated injury issue January July June knee lant letter dated lifting limitation loss March matter medical evidence ment merit myocardial infarction noted notice November October Office of Workers Office's opinion overpayment pain patient payment percent performance period permanent physical physician position Post Office present prior Procedure reasons received reconsideration record referred relationship relevant remanded request result schedule award September shows specific statement submitted sustained tion treatment