Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 41U.S. Department of Labor, Employees' Compensation Appeals Board., 1989 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 7
... Office . That is a function within the discretion of the Office based on the criteria in 20 C.F.R. § 10.145 pertaining to ... Office's decision approving the attorney's fee did not address the professional qualifications of appellant's ...
... Office . That is a function within the discretion of the Office based on the criteria in 20 C.F.R. § 10.145 pertaining to ... Office's decision approving the attorney's fee did not address the professional qualifications of appellant's ...
Strana 12
... Office's decision was the first time appellant was notified that a narrative medical report was required . The case ... DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Investigation or inquiry by Office.
... Office's decision was the first time appellant was notified that a narrative medical report was required . The case ... DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Investigation or inquiry by Office.
Strana 14
... Office to simply produce a physician's opinion negating causal relationship . As with the case when the burden of proof is upon a ... Office rescinded acceptance 14 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Rescission of acceptance by Office.
... Office to simply produce a physician's opinion negating causal relationship . As with the case when the burden of proof is upon a ... Office rescinded acceptance 14 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Rescission of acceptance by Office.
Strana 15
... Office rescinded acceptance of appellant's claim asserting that it had " inadvertently " accepted the original claim . The Board noted that it was the Office's burden of proving that its acceptance of the claim was erroneous or that ...
... Office rescinded acceptance of appellant's claim asserting that it had " inadvertently " accepted the original claim . The Board noted that it was the Office's burden of proving that its acceptance of the claim was erroneous or that ...
Strana 20
... Office did not properly adjudicate all aspects of appellant's occupational disease claim . In addition to alleging that her degenerative joint ... Office is 20 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Adjudication Damage to personal property.
... Office did not properly adjudicate all aspects of appellant's occupational disease claim . In addition to alleging that her degenerative joint ... Office is 20 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Adjudication Damage to personal property.
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accepted activities additional advised aggravation alleged amount appellant appellant submitted appellant's appellant's claim application August authority basis benefits Board Board finds Board-certified causally related caused claim claimant compensation concluded condition considered continued December decision denied Department determined disability disease duty ECAB employee employing establishment employment employment injury entitled establishment evaluation examination fact factors February Federal filed finds follows further Guides hearing impairment indicated injury issue January July June knee lant letter dated lifting limitation loss March matter medical evidence ment merit myocardial infarction noted notice November October Office of Workers Office's opinion overpayment pain patient payment percent performance period permanent physical physician position Post Office present prior Procedure reasons received reconsideration record referred relationship relevant remanded request result schedule award September shows specific statement submitted sustained tion treatment