Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 41U.S. Department of Labor, Employees' Compensation Appeals Board., 1989 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 74
Strana 15
... merit review of her claim even though her request for reconsideration was clearly outside the one - year period for obtaining merit review under the requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 10.138 ( b ) ( 1 ) . The Office subsequently corrected its ...
... merit review of her claim even though her request for reconsideration was clearly outside the one - year period for obtaining merit review under the requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 10.138 ( b ) ( 1 ) . The Office subsequently corrected its ...
Strana 58
... merit review of appellant's claim . Severiano Marquez , 41 ECAB 637 ( 1990 ) . The Office determined that appellant sustained a temporary aggravation of a preexisting foot condition which ceased by 1987. In support of her request for ...
... merit review of appellant's claim . Severiano Marquez , 41 ECAB 637 ( 1990 ) . The Office determined that appellant sustained a temporary aggravation of a preexisting foot condition which ceased by 1987. In support of her request for ...
Strana 59
... review and may obtain merit review provided the requirements as set forth in section 10.138 ( b ) ( 1 ) are also met . Leon D. Faidley , Jr. , 41 ECAB 104 ( 1989 ) ; Gregory Griffin , 41 ECAB 186 ( 1989 ) ; Norman L. Nowakowski , 41 ...
... review and may obtain merit review provided the requirements as set forth in section 10.138 ( b ) ( 1 ) are also met . Leon D. Faidley , Jr. , 41 ECAB 104 ( 1989 ) ; Gregory Griffin , 41 ECAB 186 ( 1989 ) ; Norman L. Nowakowski , 41 ...
Strana 60
... merit review of a claim under 5 U.S.C. § 8128 ( a ) , Congress left it to the discretion of the Office to determine under what circumstances merit review of a claim is proper . Thus a decision on whether merit review under section 8128 ...
... merit review of a claim under 5 U.S.C. § 8128 ( a ) , Congress left it to the discretion of the Office to determine under what circumstances merit review of a claim is proper . Thus a decision on whether merit review under section 8128 ...
Strana 61
... review of her claim even though her request for reconsideration was clearly outside the one - year period for obtaining merit review under the requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 10.138 ( b ) ( 1 ) . The Office subsequently corrected its error ...
... review of her claim even though her request for reconsideration was clearly outside the one - year period for obtaining merit review under the requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 10.138 ( b ) ( 1 ) . The Office subsequently corrected its error ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accepted activities additional advised aggravation alleged amount appellant appellant submitted appellant's appellant's claim application August authority basis benefits Board Board finds Board-certified causally related caused claim claimant compensation concluded condition considered continued December decision denied Department determined disability disease duty ECAB employee employing establishment employment employment injury entitled establishment evaluation examination fact factors February Federal filed finds follows further Guides hearing impairment indicated injury issue January July June knee lant letter dated lifting limitation loss March matter medical evidence ment merit myocardial infarction noted notice November October Office of Workers Office's opinion overpayment pain patient payment percent performance period permanent physical physician position Post Office present prior Procedure reasons received reconsideration record referred relationship relevant remanded request result schedule award September shows specific statement submitted sustained tion treatment