Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 41U.S. Department of Labor, Employees' Compensation Appeals Board., 1989 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 98
Strana 15
... appellant's claim asserting that it had " inadvertently " accepted the original claim . The Board noted that it was the Office's burden of proving that its acceptance of the claim was erroneous or that appellant's employment - related ...
... appellant's claim asserting that it had " inadvertently " accepted the original claim . The Board noted that it was the Office's burden of proving that its acceptance of the claim was erroneous or that appellant's employment - related ...
Strana 55
... appellant . The Board noted that appellant experienced a seizure at work and was rendered helpless to provide for his own care . Appellant's coworkers promptly recognized his state and proceeded to transport him from the job site . The ...
... appellant . The Board noted that appellant experienced a seizure at work and was rendered helpless to provide for his own care . Appellant's coworkers promptly recognized his state and proceeded to transport him from the job site . The ...
Strana 57
... appellant had a permanent , progressive pulmonary condition . The Office referral physician stated that appellant's asthma condition was not caused by his federal employment and had only been temporarily aggravated by the dust and fume ...
... appellant had a permanent , progressive pulmonary condition . The Office referral physician stated that appellant's asthma condition was not caused by his federal employment and had only been temporarily aggravated by the dust and fume ...
Strana 73
... appellant's relocation expenses , the Office did not consider whether the relocation was financially prohibitive as defined in the Federal ( FECA ) Procedure Manual . The Board noted that in Ricardo G. Contreras , 39 ECAB 777 ( 1988 ) ...
... appellant's relocation expenses , the Office did not consider whether the relocation was financially prohibitive as defined in the Federal ( FECA ) Procedure Manual . The Board noted that in Ricardo G. Contreras , 39 ECAB 777 ( 1988 ) ...
Strana 93
... indicated that appellant was found to have a pathologic medial plica . He noted that both menisci were completely normal . By letter dated July 11 , 1984 , the Office of Workers ' Compensation Programs accepted " the traumatic right ...
... indicated that appellant was found to have a pathologic medial plica . He noted that both menisci were completely normal . By letter dated July 11 , 1984 , the Office of Workers ' Compensation Programs accepted " the traumatic right ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accepted activities additional advised aggravation alleged amount appellant appellant submitted appellant's appellant's claim application August authority basis benefits Board Board finds Board-certified causally related caused claim claimant compensation concluded condition considered continued December decision denied Department determined disability disease duty ECAB employee employing establishment employment employment injury entitled establishment evaluation examination fact factors February Federal filed finds follows further Guides hearing impairment indicated injury issue January July June knee lant letter dated lifting limitation loss March matter medical evidence ment merit myocardial infarction noted notice November October Office of Workers Office's opinion overpayment pain patient payment percent performance period permanent physical physician position Post Office present prior Procedure reasons received reconsideration record referred relationship relevant remanded request result schedule award September shows specific statement submitted sustained tion treatment