 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1947 - 1044 str.
...and other amendments to our Constitution imply the same doctrine. The Supreme Court has declared : The very purpose of a bill of rights was to withdraw...to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a Iree press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rlgbts may not be submitted to vote... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Public Welfare - 1947 - 1194 str.
...and other amendments to our Constitution imply the same doctrine. The Supreme Court has declared : The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw...political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of IMjorities and officials, and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Public Welfare - 1947 - 844 str.
...by him beyond his quota. But the same Justice Jackson said in the well-ndvertised Flag Salute case : "'The very purpose of a bill of rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of public controversy, to place • them beyond the reach of majorities and officially to establish them... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Public Welfare - 1947 - 828 str.
...by him beyond his quota. But the same Justice Jackson said in the well-advertised Flag Salute case : '"The very purpose of a bill of rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of public controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officially to establish them as... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957 - 1146 str.
...constitutional ame: ment. In Mr. Justice Jackson's phrase, 'One's right to life, liberty, and prope to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fun mental rights may not be submitted to vote ; they depend on the outcome of elections' ( West Virginia... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1963 - 688 str.
...Justice Jackson for the Court in West Virginia, Board of Education v. Bamette, 319 US 624, 638 (1943) : "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw...principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to ... freedom of worship . . . and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1963 - 700 str.
...Justice Jackson for the Court in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624, 638 (1943) : "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw...principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to ... freedom of worship . . . and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1964 - 648 str.
...Justice Jackson for the Court in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624, 638 (1943) : "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw...principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to ... freedom of worship . . . and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1964 - 200 str.
...Justice Jackson for the Court in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette (319U.S. 624,638 (1943)): "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw...principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to * * * freedom of worship * * * and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1964 - 860 str.
...liberty in our country. The intent of the Bill of Rights, as Justice Jackson declared, in 319 US 624, "was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes...principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to * * * freedom of worship * * * and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote: they depend... | |
| |
very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. 
