| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 806 str.
...Justice COOLEY expresses the distinction as follows: "The officer is distinguished from the employee in the greater importance, dignity, and independence...though not necessarily, in the tenure of his position." The court of criminal appeals of Texas has decided that "a policeman of a city is a public officer... | |
| 1920 - 1144 str.
...particular individual, who for the time will be the officer. The officer is distinguished from the employé in the greater importance, dignity and independence...misfeasance or nonfeasance in office, and usually, though Dot necessarily, in the tenure of his position. In particular cases other distinctions will appear... | |
| 1894 - 1208 str.
...individual, who, for the time, will be the officer. The officer is distinguished from the employé in the greater importance, dignity, and independence...the liability to be called to account as a public oflicer for misfeasance or noufeasance in office, usually, thouph not necessarily, in the tenure of... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1898 - 1014 str.
...individual, who, for the time being, will be the officer. The officer is distinguished from the employe in the greater importance, dignity, and independence...official oath, and perhaps to give an official bond. In liability to be called to account as a public offender for misfeasance in office, and usually, though... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1898 - 1004 str.
...Individual, who, for the time being, will be tho officer. The officer is distinguished from the employe in the greater Importance, dignity, and independence...an official oath, and perhaps to give an official boud, in liability to be called to account as a public offender for misfeasance in office, and usually,... | |
| Albert Poole Jacobs, Henry Allen Chaney - 1889 - 1158 str.
...McDuffee, 15 M. 861; Shurbun v. Hooper, 40 M. 504. 4. An officer is distinguished from an employee in the greater importance, dignity and independence...perhaps to give an official bond; in the liability to account for misfeasance or non-feasance, and usually, though not necessarily, in the tenure of bis... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1901 - 1064 str.
...extent of the condition can be measured." Judge Cooley distinguished the "officer" from the "employe" in the "greater importance, dignity, and independence...usually, though not necessarily, in the tenure of the position": Throop v. Langdon, 40 Mich. 673. But it has been held that an oath of office ia not... | |
| 1901 - 1120 str.
...assessors of the city of Detroit was not an office, says: "The officer is distinguished from the employee in the greater importance, dignity, and independence...bond; in the liability to be called to account as a publie offender for misfeasance in office, or nonfeasance in office, and usually, though not necessarily,... | |
| 1901 - 1162 str.
...distinguished from the employa in the greater importance, dignity, and independence of his position; ¡n being required to take an official oath, and perhaps...called to account as a public offender for misfeasance in office; and usually, though not necessarily, in the tenure of his position." In particular cases... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - 1901 - 1058 str.
...exercise some portion of the sovereign power of the state. An officer is distinguished from an employ^ in the greater Importance, dignity, and Independence...being required to take an official oath, and perhaps give an official bond, in liability to be called to account as a public offender for misfeasance, and... | |
| |