 | 1818 - 764 str.
...case, as they mean to give their opinion only on the abstract question put to them, and to say that the mere fact of the marriage having been celebrated in England, whether between English or Scots parties, is not per te a defence against an action of divorce for adultery committed oere* On... | |
 | Scotland. Commissary Court (Edinburgh), James Fergusson - 1817 - 490 str.
...as " they mean to give their opinion only on the abstract ques,*' tion put to them, and to say that the mere fact of the " marriage having been celebrated in England, whether be" tween English or Scots parties, is not per se a defence " against an action of divorce for adultery... | |
 | 1818 - 782 str.
...case, as they mean to give their opinion only on the abstract question put to them, and to say that the mere fact of the marriage having been celebrated in England, whether between English or Scots parties, is not per se a defence against an action of divorce for adultery committed here. •••>... | |
 | William Gifford, Sir John Taylor Coleridge, John Gibson Lockhart, Whitwell Elwin, William Macpherson, William Smith, Sir John Murray (IV), Rowland Edmund Prothero (Baron Ernle) - 1821 - 596 str.
...words — ' they mean to give their opinion only on the abstract question put to them, and to say that the mere fact of the marriage having been celebrated in England, whether between English or Scots parties, is not per se a defence against an action of divorce for adultery committed here.' It... | |
 | William Gifford, Sir John Taylor Coleridge, John Gibson Lockhart, Whitwell Elwin, William Macpherson, Sir William Smith, Rowland Edmund Prothero Baron Ernle, George Walter Prothero - 1821 - 612 str.
...words — ' they mean to give their opinion only on the abstract question put to them, and to say that the mere fact of the marriage having been celebrated in England, whether between English or Scots parties, is not per se a defence against an action of divorce for adultery committed here.' Jt... | |
 | John Haggard - 1829 - 900 str.
...where the contract is entered into is to regulate : though the Scotch lawyers hold, that in a contract of marriage the law of Scotland has nothing to do...was done as the lady died. The observations of Lord CASES DETERMINED IN THE 1831. Eldon and Lord Redesdale in that case pretty CONWAY OTHERWISE BEAZLEY... | |
 | Robert Walsh - 1835 - 568 str.
...Scottish persons, domiciled in Scotland, or are afterwards bonaf.de, and permanently domiciled there. The mere fact of the marriage having been celebrated in England, whether between English or Scottish parties, is not, per se, a defence against an action of divorce, for adultery committed there.... | |
 | Robert Walsh - 1835 - 582 str.
...Scottish persons, domiciled in Scotland, or are afterwards bonafde, and permanently domiciled there. The mere fact of the marriage having been celebrated in England, whether between English or Scottish parties, is not, per se, a defence against an action of divorce, for adultery committed there.... | |
 | William Burge - 1838 - 878 str.
...case, as they mean to give their opinion only on the abstract question put to them, and to say, that the mere fact of the marriage having been celebrated...against an action of divorce for adultery committed here." (a) These several interlocutors were reversed. It was decided with the concurrence of all the... | |
 | Joseph Story - 1841 - 966 str.
...The result of these opinions (the unanimous opinions of the judges of the Court of Session) is, that the mere fact of the marriage having been celebrated in England, whether it is between English parties or Scottish parties, or both, is not per se a defence against a suit... | |
| |
... they mean to give their opinion only on the abstract question put to them, and to say that the mere fact of the marriage having been celebrated in England, whether between English or Scots parties, is not per se a defence against an action of divorce... 