What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionNYU Press, 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 89
... these, usually called Brown I, was decided on May 17, 1954. It held that state-enforced racial segregation of public school children violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The second opinion, decided ix Preface.
... Fourteenth Amendment. The second opinion, decided the same day, was Bolling v. Sharpe. While Brown concerned the states, Bolling concerned racial discrimination by the federal government. Bolling held that although the Fourteenth ...
... Fourteenth Amendment wanted only limited equality for blacks. That is one reason why a Fifteenth Amendment, explicitly granting blacks the right to vote, was thought necessary. Many of the contributors to this volume have distinctive ...
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Obsah
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |