What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionNYU Press, 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 39
... argued in 1959 that he could not come up with a neutral principle to justify the result in the case. Critics of the philosophy of original intention have pointed to Brown as a counterexample, arguing that the framers and ratifiers of ...
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Obsah
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |