What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionNYU Press, 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 33
... decided on May 17, 1954. It held that state-enforced racial segregation of public school children violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The second opinion, decided ix Preface.
... decided the same day, was Bolling v. Sharpe. While Brown concerned the states, Bolling concerned racial discrimination by the federal government. Bolling held that although the Fourteenth Amendment applied to the states, racial ...
... decided, many critics thought that Brown was inconsistent with sound principles of constitutional interpretation. Herbert Wechsler of Columbia Law School famously argued in 1959 that he could not come up with a neutral principle to ...
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Obsah
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |