What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionNYU Press, 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 48
... issues. The opinion we call Brown is actually three opinions. The first of these, usually called Brown I, was decided on May 17, 1954. It held that state-enforced racial segregation of public school children violated the Equal ...
... issues raised by all three of these opinions: Brown I (the legality of segregation), Brown II (remedy), and Bolling v. Sharpe (applicability to the federal government). It is important to be clear about the purpose of such an exercise ...
... issues that were at stake in the case. Part II features the contributors' revised opinions. Finally, as an appendix, I have included Chief Justice Warren's original opinions in Brown I, Bolling, and Brown II for comparison. I am ...
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Obsah
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |