What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionNYU Press, 2001 - Počet stran: 257 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 40
... (concurring in the judgment) 158 • Cass R. Sunstein (concurring in the judgment) 174 • Derrick A. Bell (dissenting) 185 • Comments from the Contributors 201 Appendix A: The Supreme Court's Original Opinions in Brown I, vii.
... Original Opinions in Brown I, Bolling, and Brown II Brown v. Board of Education (Brown I) Bolling v. Sharpe Brown v. Board of Education (Brown II) Appendix B: The Constitution of the United States of America: Selected Provisions Brown v ...
... original intention have pointed to Brown as a counterexample, arguing that the framers and ratifiers of the Fourteenth Amendment wanted only limited equality for blacks. That is one reason why a Fifteenth Amendment, explicitly granting ...
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný..
Obsah
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |