 ... in actions by or against executors, administrators, or guardians, in which judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other as to any transaction with, or statement by, the testator, intestate,...  The Atlantic Reporter - Strana 2391916Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1877 - 810 str.
...Provided, that in actions by or against executors, administrators, or guardians, in which judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party...testify against the other as to any transaction with or statements by the testator, intestate or ward," etc. This is not a suit by or against the executor,... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1872 - 752 str.
...provided, that, "in actions by or against executors, administrators or guardians, in which judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party...be allowed to testify against the other, as to any transactions with, or statements to, the testator, intestate or ward, unless called to testify thereto... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1842 - 742 str.
...schedule to our present Constitution, which provides, that in actions by or against executors, etc., neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other as to any transactions with, or statements of the testator, etc. The evi-dence was competent. See Wassell v.... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1870 - 806 str.
...§ 2704 Rev. Code, that where an executor or administrator is a party to a suit, neither party shall testify against the other, as to any transaction with or statement by the testator, or intestate, and she is a competent witness.— O'Neal v. Reynolds 197 WITNESS— CouTnnnsD. 3. How... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1888 - 714 str.
...persons of disability to testify in civil suits on account of interest, contains an exception "that neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other as to any trans[Miller, Adm'r., v. Cannon & Co.] action with, or statement by a deceased person, whose estate... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1886 - 744 str.
...neither party shall lie allowed to testify against the other as to any transactions with, or statements by the testator, intestate or ward, unless called to testify by the opposite party," a contest over a will •was held not to be a suit by or against an executor in such a sense as to bring... | |
 | United States - 1865 - 216 str.
...Provided, further, That in actions by or against executors, administrators, or guardians, in which judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party...testator, intestate, or ward, unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party, or required to testify thereto by the court. Approved March 3, 1865.... | |
 | Henry Mills Alden, Frederick Lewis Allen, Lee Foster Hartman, Thomas Bucklin Wells - 1865 - 834 str.
...providing that in any action by or against any executan, administrators, or guardians, in which judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other unices called to do so by the other. — Resolution of inquiry relative to prisoners confined in Old... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1875 - 732 str.
...administrators, or guardians, in which judgments may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall bo allowed to testify against the other as to any transaction...testator, intestate, or ward, unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party, or required to testify thereto by tho court. In all other respects the... | |
 | Alabama - 1867 - 824 str.
...executors, or administrators, (as to which a different rule is not made by the laws of this State,) neither party shall be allowed to testify against...other, as to any transaction with, or statement by the testatttr, or intestate, unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party. SEC. 2. Be it further... | |
| |
