Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub

Of the author's opinions concerning what the Christian Scriptures do or do not teach, in regard to marriage, and to the institution of the Sabbath, we shall not speak particularly. It is enough to say, that while Christians are divided into an infinite variety of sects on other subjects, they are sufficiently well united on these. The usage in each particular might have been well understood by the immediate disciples of Christ, and have been sanctioned by his authority, and yet not have been subjects of express instruction, or of historical record. And if we advert, in this connexion, to the immemorial practice of the Christian Church, it seems to us that all grounds of scepticism concerning marriage, and the observance of a stated Sabbath, as both are now regarded, are sufficiently removed. If Christianity was intended to serve the highest moral purposes, which no true believer can doubt, it could never have sanctioned polygamy, so destructive as it would be of all the purest virtues that grow out of the domestic relations. And if it was intended for a perpetual religion, which is alike unquestionable, it would not have overlooked a principal means of its own preservation.

There is one other subject to which we shall advert for a moment, before we close our remarks, and that is to the author's opinions concerning Death.

'The death of the body is the loss or extinction of life. The common definition, which supposes it to consist in the separation of soul and body, is inadmissible. For what part of man is it, that dies when this separation takes place? Is it the soul? This will not be admitted by the supporters of the above definition. Is it then the body? But how can that be said to die, which never had any life of itself? Therefore the separation of soul and body cannot be called the death of man.' Vol. 1. pp. 362, 363.

After discussing the subject, and examining the texts of Scripture relating to it at considerable length, he concludes with the explicit declaration of his belief in the death of the whole man, and his remaining in unconscious rest to the day of the resurrection and final judgment. In all this there is the same tincture of materialism, that we have noticed before. But while we have not room to follow him in the arguments, which he deduces from Scripture and philosophy, till he comes to the fearful result of all his reasoning; yet we think there are instances enough in the New Testament to encourage us in the belief, that when the frail body returns to the dust from whence

it came, the spirit will return to God who gave it. The doctrine maintained by Milton is not, indeed, so overwhelming as that of total annihilation; but it reminds us of that passage in his Paradise Lost, in which even infernal spirits cannot contemplate the extinction of being without horror. And amidst the greatest afflictions of our mixed condition, when wholly submissive to the will of God, we should be with difficulty reconciled to the loss of existence, for we know not how many ages.

To be no more; sad cure! for who would lose
Though full of pain, this intellectual being,
Those thoughts that wander through eternity,
To perish rather, swallowed up and lost
In the wide womb of uncreated night,
Devoid of sense and motion?'

Though we are aware, that we have distorted this passage from its intended application, yet it is so far applicable to the case before us, that it presented itself to us uncalled for. On such a solemn subject we are not disposed to dogmatize; but since death is not the final extinction of being, we cannot believe, without being expressly taught so, that it is a long suspension of existence, limited only by the remote (we know not how remote) consummation of all things here upon the earth.

We have seen some contemptuous expressions concerning this Treatise of Milton; much more contemptuous than, from our examination of the work, it seems to deserve. The mere biblical critic may not value it highly; the mere metaphysician may not value it highly; but one who is fond of comparing Scripture with Scripture, and finding what is taught by its general tenor, rather than what seems to be taught in a few detached passages, will have no inconsiderable respect for it. For upon every subject is cited a great collection of texts, as proofs, not indeed always apposite, but in general so many texts, and so much that is apposite, as, one would think, almost to exhaust this species of proof. This will save the theologian, who is examining the same subjects, much expense of time, in turning over the leaves of his concordance, and present to him in a train, all that he would seek for. In applying and weighing the value of texts, he may often have occasion to differ from the author; but this makes no greater deduction from the merits of the work, than is to be expected in such a mass of extracts, under the various subjects. In reasoning from Scripture, or from the sug

gestions of his own mind, he seems for the most part free from a contentious spirit, and an overweening fondness for his own opinions. If we are disappointed, on the whole, that so great a man in the poetical world, and one so distinguished by his political writings, is not also first among theologians, it is a disappointment arising from the unreasonableness of our expectations.

ART. VI.-Memoir of the Life of Richard Henry Lee, and his Correspondence with the most distinguished Men in America and Europe, illustrative of their Characters, and of the Events of the American Revolution. By his Grandson, RICHARD H. LEE, of Leesburg, Virginia. Philadelphia.

1825.

It has been said, that we of the North are prone to laud our own men and things. This is probably true, since, if we had not this disposition, we should form an exception to one of the most general laws of human society. Beginning with the first natural combination, the family (the only natural one according to Rousseau), and ascending to kingdoms and empires, a disposition to boast may always be traced, where it is not controlled by some stronger passion. In this country, our peculiar political organization has set two forms of this vanity in occasional opposition to each other. The disposition to laud certain things, which we might cherish simply as Americans, is controlled and modified by our State partialities. We are sometimes afraid to speak in unqualified terms of those, who are only our countrymen, lest we should do injustice to the paramount claims of those, whose reputation may be the pride of the individual State to which we belong.

[ocr errors]

For ourselves, we are not inclined to censure the operation of the latter feeling. We are disposed to be very indulgent, not only to the New Englander, who derives all that there is valuable, in American institutions, from the principles of the Pilgrims, and to the Pennsylvanian, who proposes the founder of his commonwealth as the perfect model of a legislator; but also to the Virginian, who believes that but for Patrick Henry the spark of the Revolution would never have been struck out, and to the VOL. XXII.-NO. 51.

48

Bostonian, who is equally confident, that when James Otis made his argument against writs of assistance, American liberty began to be. We esteem all this both honorable and natural. If it be worth while to take any distinctions on this subject, as we shall probably not be suspected of any factious intention, we would say, that the State feeling is one of deeper growth in this country, than any which connects itself with our general existence as a nation. Some of our politicians, as it has suited either their immediate interests, or has been dictated by their general views, have taught that the State feeling should be repressed as pernicious.* We doubt this extremely, either as possible or desirable. It is true, that our national existence is every day gaining in that veneration, which time alone confers; but it is equally true, that, at present, our strongest historic recollections belong to us as States; for when we boast of our great revolutionary characters, we boast of them, not so much as Americans, but as citizens of the commonwealth to which we belong. Destroy the local tie, which binds together the people of each State, and the Union would not survive a day. We repeat, that, in enthusiastic attachment to our happy Union, we are exceeded by none who enjoy its blessings. But so far is it from being true, as was urged in the ardor of debate, in the federal Convention, by the advocates of a more perfectly consolidated system, that the States are metaphysical, ideal existences, that we should rather maintain the contrary. The Union, comparatively speaking, is the metaphysical and theoretical thing. Like the illimitable city, where its central point is fixed, it yet looks raw and new. Its operation is occasionally sharp and harsh; it wants the feeling of age. But the States, at least the thirteen States, come home in a different way to the hearts of their citizens. They are not metaphysical, they are historical beings. The family feeling binds their parts together. The seat of power is in their bosom. Every village sends its representative to the council fire, which is thus connected by a living tie to the firesides of the people.

But for the very reason, that the State feeling has this foundation in nature, it is becoming the philosophic patriot to be ready to apply the proper corrective to its excess. Nothing ought to be a more constant object of attention to him, than to promote

*Every thing that tends to strengthen the peculiar and exclusive feelings of State pride and sectional prejudice inevitably weakens the bonds of the Union.'-Report of a Select Committee for Amending the Constitution, December 22, 1823.

with fond care, the harmonious action upon each other of the parts of that most curiously complicated machine, which is formed out of the combination of our State and national institutions, and which constitutes the most extraordinary phenomenon in the political history of man. For this reason, we esteem it the duty of every true friend of his country's welfare among us to be most prompt and cordial in doing justice to the reputation of the distinguished characters of every State in the confederacy. However natural and however commendable the zeal of bearing testimony to the worth of which our own State has been the cradle and the stage, we ought to study with delight the honorable annals of our sister communities, and pay a hearty tribute to all we find in them of heroism and wisdom, in the field and in the cabinet. This is the dictate not less of justice than of magnanimity; for, after all, the great deeds and the great men of earlier or later years, to which the United States are indebted for their present prosperity, are not so confined to any one quarter, that the aid of all others could, in any degree, have been dispensed with.

In regard to revolutionary merits, a great and honorable controversy has been waged between Virginia and Massachusettsnow both of them somewhat declined from their former preeminence in numbers and power-then the leading States of the Union. But it ought, we think, to be conceded on both hands, that in the stern struggle for our liberties, the contest at the time was not so light and promising, that the voice or the arm of one of our champions could have been spared. Every man was essential. Every one, who served his country, did it precious service. There was no such superabundance of power, on our side, that it is fair to divide services into those, which were essential, and those which were subsidiary; into those, with which the cause could have dispensed, and those, without which it would have suffered shipwreck. The humble sexton, who lighted the lamps in Christ Church steeple, on the night of the eighteenth of April; and the honest rustics, who defeated the treacherous project for the surrender of West Point, may, in the series of events, have rendered services as important, as those of Brooks when he leaped the entrenchments at Saratoga, or Lafayette when he stormed the lines at Yorktown.

It is one of the characteristics of a crisis like our Revolution, that it produces an astonishing developement of talent and resource, among all classes of the community. It not only stimu

« PředchozíPokračovat »