Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub

Mr. SCRIVNER. Why was that necessary? Why would you be changing from downstream to upstream?

Colonel FERINGA. As part of the seepage-control work.

Mr. SCRIVNER. Your plans originally called for downstream sluice? Colonel FERINGA. That is right.

Mr. SCRIVNER. How does it happen that the plans now call for upstream?

General WHEELER. After the dam was put in we found excess seepage and we sent a board out there to find out what measure would be necessary to correct the situation, and this was of the items recommended.

Mr. SCRIVNER. Of all the dams built and those which we are building, how many are there in which this problem has come up?

Colonel FERINGA. Of all the dams built this is the only one that has come up.

Mr. SCRIVNER. Do you anticipate that any of these will have extreme seepage that are being built or have been built?

Colonel FERINGA. We expect not.

General WHEELER. We maintain a constant inspection, Congressman Scrivner, in all our dams for seepage. That is a condition that must be taken care of and we make plans to meet it but you cannot determine in advance all of the forces of nature and the measures needed for exact control.

Mr. SCRIVNER. That is why I was concerned. Seepage is something that would lead to a great many difficulties and might call for an expenditure of a lot of money on some of these places where a lot of money has already been spent. And that is why I was so concerned with that particular item.

Colonel FERINGA. It is relieved in any number of ways. You might say in answer to your question that at Fort Peck we had to drive some relief wells. You cannot always determine exactly where underground waters are going to go.

As General Wheeler says, one of his assistants constantly goes from dam to dam to see if it is operating the way we expect it. Ninetynine times out of 100 they do. If he sees any tell-tale marks we take the remedial measures to prevent further deterioration.

APPROPRIATION FOR 1948

Mr. KERR. General Wheeler, what is the present allotment for the fiscal year 1948?

General WHEELER. For maintenance of completed flood control works during the fiscal year 1948, there was appropriated $2,400,000. Mr. KERR. Of necessity, as your plans continue it costs more? General WHEELER. Yes, sir. We construct more structures and that increases the maintenance.

Mr. KERR. Yes, sir.

Mr. ENGEL. Any further questions?

If not, we will proceed to the next project.

REPAIR, RESTORATION AND STRENGTHENING OF LEVEES AND OTHER FLOOD CONTROL WORKS

[blocks in formation]

LANGUAGE CHANGE AND SUMMARY OF PROJECTS

Mr. ENGEL. The next project is project 7:

For the repair, restoration, and strengthening of levees and other flood-control works in accordance with the act of June 23, 1947, $3,000,000.

We will place in the record at this point page 687. (The matter referred to is as follows:)

Flood Control, General (Emergency Fund)

CHANGE IN LANGUAGE

[Emergency Flood Control Work, $12,000,000, to be expended in accord with the provisions of the bill, H. R. 3792, Eightieth Congress, if and when such bill is enacted into law, and to remain available until expended.] (1)

[The funds provided in the preceding paragraph shall be available to an amount not exceeding $250,000 to take all action necessary to prevent erosion at Anaheim Bay, Surfside, California.] (1)

For the repair, restoration, and strengthening of levees and other flood-control works in accordance with the act of June 23, 1947 (Public Law 102). $3,000,000. (Act of June 27, 1947, Public Law 122.) (2)

[blocks in formation]

PURPOSE OF THE PROGRAM

Mr. ENGEL. All right, will you tell us about this program?
General WHEELER. All right, sir.

Public Law 102, Eightieth Congress, first session, approved June 23, 1947, authorized the sum of $15,000,000 to be appropriated under the direction of the Secretary of War and the supervision of the Chief of Engineers for the repair, restoration, and strengthening of levees and other flood-control works which may have been threatened or destroyed by recent floods or which may be threatened or destroyed by later floods. The Second Urgent Deficiency Appropriation Act approved June 27, 1947, appropriated the sum of $12,000,000 for the emergency repair work authorized in the above act.

The funds appropriated have been allocated to more than 280 repair projects throughout the United States and are not sufficient to permit the completion of all emergency repair work necessitated by the floods of last year.

An urgent need exists for the additional amount of $3,000,000 in order that all of the most urgently needed flood repairs can be accomplished as soon as possible and wherever feasible prior to the next flood season.

The completion of these urgently needed repairs will restore protection to large agricultural, industrial, and residential areas which are now subject to damages during floods.

Mr. ENGEL. That is a part of the $15,000,000 emergency fund authorized last year after those floods?

General WHEELER. That is right.

Mr. ENGEL. Any question on that?

Mr. SCRIVNER. Is thre any question that this $3,000,000 be made immediately available?

Colonel FERINGA. Twelve million dollars has been made available and $3,000,000 will be immediately available upon appropriation. Mr. SCRIVNER. It says it is for the next flood season that comes this next spring, or are you talking about next spring?

Colonel FERINGA. We are hoping it will be for next spring.
Mr. SCRIVNER. This is for 1949?

General WHEELER. No, sir; for 1948. It is available as soon as the appropriation act is passed.

Colonel FERINGA. The funds become available when the bill is enacted and remain available until expended.

Mr. MAHON. Is that the total amount required?

Colonel FERINGA. To complete the authorization of $15,000,000. That $12,000,000 has been appropriated and we are asking for the $3,000,000.

Mr. MAHON. Is it possible that additional sums will be required in excess of the $3,000,000 which you ask for?

Colonel FERINGA. There has been introduced a $25,000,000 authorization bill, whether that will be enacted or not, we do not know.

ALLOCATION OF APPROPRIATION NOW AVAILABLE

Mr. CASE. Mr. Chairman, should we not have the list of projects on which this $12,000,000 has been spent?

Mr. ENGEL. I would like to have them placed in the record. (The information is as follows:)

Flood control, general, emergency fund allocation of $12,000,000 appropriated

[blocks in formation]

Pine Bluff, Little Bayou Meto, Cummins Bend, Hannaberry Lake,

and Fletcher Bend levees, Arkansas..

130, 000

Big Bayou Meto, Ark..

100, 000

Curtis Place levee, Red River, La

20, 000

[blocks in formation]

Atchafalaya drainage district, Yazoo River, Miss

22, 000

Straight Bayou drainage district, Yazoo River, Miss.

23, 000

Lake Pontchartrain in vicinity of New Orleans, La
Vicinity of Jefferson, Tex...

75, 000

28, 600

Southwestern division:

Arroyo de la Matanza, Socorro, N. Mex.

7, 550

Bois d'Arc levee district, Texas..

169, 000

Henderson County levee improvement district No. 1, Texas.

Plum Bayou levee district in vicinity of Jefferson County Free

[blocks in formation]

I. N. Compton private levee, Kansas..

Dallas County levee improvement district No. 6, Muddy

1,000

750

J. T. Crow levee district, Oklahoma.

9,000

Fred Aemisegger private levee district, Kansas.

6, 250

Lowry private levee, Grand (Neosho) River, Kans.

Murray private levee, Grand (Neosho) River, Kans__

Monroe, Bryant and Rau private levee district, Kansas.

1, 900

4, 400

1, 150

John Steve private levee, Arkansas River, Okla
Orton levee district, Arkansas_.

1,500

1, 900

Repairs to flood-control structures, Plum Bayou levee district,
Arkansas...

25, 000

Upper Mississippi Valley division:

20, 000

Columbus Junction, Iowa, town levees

W. W. Chatterton levee, Louisa County, Iowa.

1,000

Harrisonville and Ivy Landing drainage and levee district,
Illinois..

1,000

66,000

Flood control, general, emergency fund allocation of $12,000,000 appropriated-Con. DIVISION AND PROJECT-continued

Upper Mississippi Valley division-Continued.

Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing drainage and levee district No. 5,
Illinois__

Stringtown drainage and levee district, Illinois

Degognia and Fountain Bluff drainage and levee district,
Illinois_-

Prairie du Pont drainage and levee district, Illinois_
Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice drainage and levee district,
Illinois.

Chouteau Island drainage and levee district, Illinois.

Des Moines and Mississippi River levee district No. 1, Missouri
Indian Grave drainage district, Quincy, Ill....

South Quincy levee and drainage district, Illinois.

Marion County drainage district, Missouri..

Amount

$25,000 25,000

65, 000 42,000

18, 000 114, 000 90,000

5, 400 73, 000 14, 000

[blocks in formation]

Low-water dam in Cahokia Diversion Channel, Illinois..

Littleport, Iowa....

Flood fighting and rescue work.

Iowa River-Flint Creek levee district No. 16, Iowa..

Lime Lake drainage district, Illinois.

Voga, town levees, Iowa..

L. L. Randall levee, Iowa__

Hills, Iowa (private levees)

F. H. Feldman levees, Iowa..

O. L. Asby levee, Iowa..

Red Rock to Tracy levees, Iowa..

Drury drainage district, Illinois.

50,000

15, 000

25, 000

15, 000

8, 000

30, 000

20, 000

89, 700

20, 000

60, 000

19, 600

225, 000

10, 000

40, 000

500

700

3, 300

1,000 4, 000

30, 000

30, 000

Fabius River drainage district, Missouri

25, 000

Sny Island levee and drainage district, Illinois.

10, 000

Louisa County levee district No. 14, Iowa.

25, 000

Union Township levees, Iowa.

15, 000

Henderson County drainage district No. 3, Illinois..

20, 000

Henderson County drainage district No. 1, Illinois..

30, 000

South River drainage district, Missouri..

15, 000

[blocks in formation]
« PředchozíPokračovat »