 | Sir John Joseph Dillon - 1811 - 214 str.
...tion, directly upon the point, is conclusive 44 upon the same matter between the same parties, E 2 " coming incidentally in question in another " Court...purpose. But neither the " judgment of a concurrent nor exclusive juris" diction, is evidence of any matter to be infer" red by argument from that judgment"... | |
 | Thomas Bayly Howell - 1814 - 730 str.
...upon the same matter, directly in question in another court: secondly, that the judgment of a court of exclusive jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is,...conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coining incidentally in question in another court, for a different purpose. -But neither the judgment... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1815 - 600 str.
...jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is conclusive, between the same parties, upon the same matter coming incidentally in question in another court for a different purpose : but that the judgment either of a court of concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is not evidence of any... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1816 - 746 str.
...different purpose ; but that the judgment either of a court of concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is not evidence of any matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their )iiri«dicfion, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), John Gallison - 1817 - 624 str.
...upon the same matter, directly in question in another court. Secondly, that the judgment of a court of exclusive jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is,...concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any Harvey vs. Richards. matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction,... | |
 | Francis Buller - 1817 - 684 str.
...between the same partics coming incidentally in question in another court for a different purpose, yet neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive...collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nur of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by agreement from the judgment.... | |
 | William Cruise - 1818 - 648 str.
...in another court. Secondly, that the judgment of a court of exclusive jurisdiction, directly up<» the point, is, in like manner, conclusive, upon the...collaterally in question, though, within their jurisdiction j nor of any matter incidentally cognizable ; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the... | |
 | Matthew Hale - 1820 - 582 str.
...upon the same matter, directly in question in another court. Secondly, that the judgment of a court of exclusive jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is,...exclusive jurisdiction, is evidence of any matter which carte collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable... | |
 | Matthew Hale - 1820 - 580 str.
...upon the same matter, directly in question in another court. Secondly, that the judgment of a court of exclusive jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is,...for a different purpose. But neither the judgment of • concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction, is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question,... | |
 | Thomas Peake - 1822 - 666 str.
...in question in another Vide 1 1 St. court for a different purpose. But neither the judgTr. aoi. ment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction, is evidence...their jurisdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognisable ; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Judgments which are merely... | |
| |
... first, that the judgment of a Court of concurrent jurisdiction directly upon the point, is as a plea, a bar, or as evidence, conclusive, between the same parties, upon the same matter, directly in question in another Court... 
