 | New York (State). - 1850 - 920 str.
...affirmative of the issue must produce the evidence to prove it. Therefore the burden of proof lies on the party, who would be defeated, if no evidence were given on either side. § 1794. The party producing a writing, as genuine, which has been altered, or appears to have been... | |
 | Kentucky - 1851 - 548 str.
...issue, must produce the evidence to prove it. § 488. The burthen of proof in the whole action lies on the party, who would be defeated if no evidence were given on either side. § 489. Where a writing purporting to have been executed by one of the parties, is referred to in and... | |
 | Kentucky - 1851 - 544 str.
...issue, must produce the evidence to prove it. § 488. The burthen of proof in the whole action lies on the party, who would be defeated if no evidence were given on either side. § 489. Where a writing purporting to have been executed by one of the parties, is referred to in and... | |
 | District of Columbia - 1857 - 788 str.
...briefly state his defence, and may briefly state the evidence he expects to offer in support of it. 3. The party who would be defeated if no evidence were...the adverse party will then produce his evidence. 4. The parties shall then be confined to rebutting evidence, unless the court for good reasons in furtherance... | |
 | Kansas - 1858 - 482 str.
...briefly state his defence, and may briefly state the evidence he expects to offer in support of it. 3. The party who would be defeated, if no evidence were...given on either side, must first produce his evidence, [and] the adverse party will then produce his evidence. 4. The parties will then be confined to rebutting... | |
 | Kansas - 1859 - 726 str.
...state his defence, and may briefly state the evidence he expects to offer in support of jt. Third, The party who would be defeated, if no evidence were...given on either side, must first produce his evidence, and the adverse party will then produce his evidence. Fourth, The parties will then be confined to... | |
 | Nebraska - 1859 - 464 str.
...briefly state his defence, and may briefly state the evidence he expects to offer in support of it. 3. The party who would be defeated if no evidence were given on either side, must first procure his evidence; the adverse party will then produce his evidence. 4. The parties will then be... | |
 | Ohio - 1860 - 986 str.
[ Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný. ] | |
 | North Dakota - 1862 - 640 str.
...briefly state his defence, and may briefly state the evidence he expects to offer in support of it. 3. The party who would be defeated, if no evidence were given on either side, must first procure his evidence ; the adverse party will then produce his evidence. 4. The parties will then be... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1862 - 622 str.
...evidence he expects to offer in support of it. " Third. The party on whom rests the burden of the issues must first produce his evidence ; the adverse party will then produce his evidence. [This order would be followed, naturally, in pursuing the introduction of further evidence by the parties,... | |
| |
The party holding the affirmative of the issue must produce the evidence to prove it; therefore, the burden of proof lies on the party who would be defeated if no evidence were given on either side. 
