...rich ones, for the benefit of others, perhaps poor ones. In the key sentence, the Court declared that "the concept that government may restrict the speech...relative voice of others is wholly foreign to the First Amendment."5 If the purpose of such laws were to increase political equality, they would be constitutionally...

...individuals and groups to influence the outcome of elections serves to justify the limitation. . . . But the concept that government may restrict the speech...of others is wholly foreign to the First Amendment. . . . The First Amendment as protection against governmental abridgement of free expression cannot...

...from distorting the political process — was also found insufficient to validate section 608(e): But the concept that government may restrict the speech...of others is wholly foreign to the First Amendment .... The First Amendment's protection against governmental abridgement of free expression cannot properly...

...advocacy of the election or defeat of candidates imposed by §608(e)(l)'s expenditure ceiling. But the concept that government may restrict the speech of some elements of our society in 54 Appellees mistakenly rely on this Court's decision in CSC v. Letter Carriers, as supporting §608(e)(l)'s...

...evaluating the relative merits of conflicting arguments, restricting the speech of some elements in society to enhance the relative voice of others Is wholly foreign to the principles of the First Amendment. However, to aid then in making their judgements, the public may...

...free press must monitor for a free people. As the US Supreme Court said in 1976 in Buckley v. Valeo: "The concept that government may restrict the speech...of others is wholly foreign to the First Amendment The First Amendment's protection against governmental abridgment of free expression cannot be made...

...economic or social views"). Cf. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 US at 48^9, 96 S.Ct. at 649 (government may not "restrict the speech of some elements of our society...in order to enhance the relative voice of others") .7 Accordingly, broadcast regulation must be tailored to guard against government action that is nonneutral,...

...the very government a free press must monitor for a free people. As the Supreme Court said in 1976: The concept that government may restrict the speech of some elements of pur society in order to enhance the relative voice of others is wholly foreign to the First Amendment....

...the very government a free press must monitor for a free people. As the Supreme Court said in 1976: The concept that government may restrict the speech of some elements of pur society in order to enhance the relative voice of others is wholly foreign to the First Amendment....

...speech would "drown out" other speakers as unsubstantiated conjecture. It stated in this regard "that ' the concept that government may restrict the speech...others is wholly foreign to the First Amendment.'" Id. , at 790-1, quoting Buckley v. Valeo, 424 US 1, 48-49 (1975). Similarly, in Consolidated Edison...