Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United StatesUnited States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 3
... briefs were Ronald A. Zumbrun and John H. Findley . Seth M. Hufstedler argued the cause for respondents . With him on the brief were Robert S. Thompson , Laurie D. Opinion of the Court 496 U. S. Zelon , Judith KELLER v . STATE BAR OF ...
... briefs were Ronald A. Zumbrun and John H. Findley . Seth M. Hufstedler argued the cause for respondents . With him on the brief were Robert S. Thompson , Laurie D. Opinion of the Court 496 U. S. Zelon , Judith KELLER v . STATE BAR OF ...
Strana 4
... Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Ad Hoc Com- mittee Opposing Lobbying and Certain Other ... brief of amicus curiae . 1The State Bar's Board of Governors is also a respondent in this action . Accordingly , the ...
... Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Ad Hoc Com- mittee Opposing Lobbying and Certain Other ... brief of amicus curiae . 1The State Bar's Board of Governors is also a respondent in this action . Accordingly , the ...
Strana 21
... briefs was Walter Hellerstein . H. Bartow Farr III reargued the cause for respondents . With him on the briefs were Robert A. Butterworth , Attor- ney General of Florida , Joseph C. Mellichamp III , Assistant Attorney General , and ...
... briefs was Walter Hellerstein . H. Bartow Farr III reargued the cause for respondents . With him on the briefs were Robert A. Butterworth , Attor- ney General of Florida , Joseph C. Mellichamp III , Assistant Attorney General , and ...
Strana 43
... Brief for Respondents on Rearg . 15 . 27 Respondents also assert that no refund is appropriate because peti- tioner most likely would pay the same amount of tax even if the preferred sliding scale tax schedules were retroactively ...
... Brief for Respondents on Rearg . 15 . 27 Respondents also assert that no refund is appropriate because peti- tioner most likely would pay the same amount of tax even if the preferred sliding scale tax schedules were retroactively ...
Strana 44
... Brief for Respondents 28. Cf. Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v . Man- hart , 435 U. S. 702 , 719-720 , n . 36 ( 1978 ) ( suggesting that it would be within district court's equitable discretion , when devising remedy for Title VII ...
... Brief for Respondents 28. Cf. Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v . Man- hart , 435 U. S. 702 , 719-720 , n . 36 ( 1978 ) ( suggesting that it would be within district court's equitable discretion , when devising remedy for Title VII ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
action activities American Trucking Assns amici curiae apply Arkansas Supreme Court Assn Attorney authority award BRENNAN certification certiorari checkpoint Chevron Oil civil claim club Commerce Clause concurring in judgment Congress constitutional Corp County Court of Appeals debtor decision dissenting 496 U. S. District Court Eleventh Amendment enforcement Establishment Clause estoppel federal law fees filed flag flat tax Florida Fourth Amendment funds Government held HUE tax Illinois issue jurisdiction JUSTICE lawyers legislative letterhead litigation Martinez-Fuerte McKesson ment militia Miranda Miranda warnings misleading National Guard NBTA noncurriculum related officer Opinion of O'CONNOR payment petitioner petitioner's plain view police pre-empted prohibit reasonable refund relief religious remedy respondent retroactivity Rule 11 Scheiner School Dist seizure sobriety checkpoint sovereign immunity speech stare decisis State's statute statutory STEVENS student groups supra Supremacy Clause Supreme Court Texaco tion tional trial United violation warrant Westside Widmar