 Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course ; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden ia on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims, acquired...  The Lancaster Law Review - Strana 2131914Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1910 - 688 str.
...3. BILLS AND NOTES. Under Comp. Laws 1907, section 1611, providing that every holder Is deemed prime facie to be a holder In due course, but, when it is shown that the title of any person who negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he -or some one... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1912 - 666 str.
...rendered in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff appeals. The court, among other things, charged the jury that every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; that by "holder in due course" is meant one who becomes a holder of the instrument before it is overdue,... | |
 | 1922 - 1138 str.
...indorsee of a bill or note, who is in possession of it, or the bearer thereof." Section 5377 says: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course." Even a payee who gets the note direct from the maker is a prima facie holder In due course. Of course,... | |
 | American Bar Association - 1905 - 980 str.
...only without consideration, but by a fraud on the makers of the note. Under s. 59 (Crawf., s. 98), when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated an instrument is defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom... | |
 | 1905 - 1120 str.
...the full amount thereof against all parties liable thereon." "Sec. 76. Every holder is deemed prlma facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who was negotiated the instrument was defective the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some other... | |
 | 1918 - 1210 str.
...means" — and also: "If it has been shown by the evidence in this case that the title of the person who negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he acquired the title as a holder in due course." The court also instructed the Jury as to what constituted... | |
 | 1911 - 1164 str.
...rendered in favor of the defendant The plaintiff appeals. The court, among other things, charged the jury that every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course ; that by "holder in due course" is meant one who becomes a holder of the instrument before it is overdue,... | |
 | 1923 - 1220 str.
...as fraudulent. As ruled in Everding & Farrell v. Toft, 82 Or. 1, 150 Рас. 757, 160 Рас. 1160 : "When it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated an instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom... | |
 | 1910 - 1168 str.
...conditions: * * * (3) That he took it In good faith and for value. • • * " Page 300. "Sec. 59. Every holder Is deemed prima facie to be a holder In due course. * • • " Page 351. AVhen we consider that It was the object of the negotiable instruments act to... | |
 | 1911 - 1164 str.
...accommodation note, would not constitute a defense against a holder in due course, and section 78 declares that "every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course." Section 71 defines a holder in due course: (1) The Instrument must be complete and regular on its face.... | |
| |
