 | 1855 - 566 str.
...of action, on different principles, and pointed out that by the 2nd section the measure of damage is not the loss or suffering of the deceased, but the injury resulting from his death to the family. In the decision of this case, the argument ab inconvenient! appears deservedly... | |
 | John Duer, New York (State). Superior Court (New York) - 1856 - 754 str.
...parties respectively for whom, and whose benefit, such action shall be brought. The measure of damages is not the loss or suffering of the deceased, but the injury resulting from his death to his family. The language seems more appropriate to a loss of which some estimate... | |
 | Edmund Powell - 1859 - 540 str.
...respectively, for whom and for whose benefit such action shall be brought." . . " The measure of damage is not the loss or suffering of the deceased, but the injury resulting from his death to his family."3 The damages are confined to injuries of which a pecuniary estimate... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1867 - 744 str.
...wounded feelings." .... By the terms of the act, quoting the second section, " the measure of damages is not the loss or suffering of the deceased, but the injury resulting from his death, to his family." This language seems more appropriate to a loss of which some estimate... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1870 - 708 str.
...wounded feelings." . . . By the terms of the act, quoting the second section, " the measure of damages is not the loss or suffering of the deceased, but the injury resulting from his death, to his family." This language seems more appropriate to a loss of which some estimate... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1867 - 674 str.
...representative a totally new right of action on different principles." " The measure of damages," he adds, " is not the loss or suffering of the deceased, but the injury resulting from his death to his family." It may well be that if King had survived his injuries, he could have... | |
 | Great Britain. Courts - 1872 - 658 str.
...respectively for whom and for whose benefit such action shall be brought." The measure of damage is not the loss or suffering of the deceased, but the injury resulting from his death to his family. This language seems more appropriate to a loss of which some estimate... | |
 | 1881 - 1112 str.
...Pennsylvania Railroad Company vs. Zebe dux,., 33 Pa. State, 328, it was said that "the measure of damage is not the loss or suffering of the deceased, but the injury resulting from his death to his family." In the case of Tlte Pennsylvania Railroad Company vs. KeUy, 7 Casey,... | |
 | Ontario. High Court of Justice - 1882 - 706 str.
...a solatinm in respect of the mental sufferings occasioned by such death: that the measure of damage was not the loss or suffering of the deceased, but the injury resulting from his death to his family : that the language of the Act seemed more appropriate to a loss of which... | |
 | Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson - 1882 - 736 str.
...c. Midland Ry. Co., 18 Ad. & Ell. (NS) 93, in which Coleridge, J., says: "The measure of damage is not the loss or suffering of the deceased, but the injury resulting from his death to his family. This language (that of the act) seems more appropriate to a loss of which... | |
| |
The measure of damage is not the loss or suffering of the deceased, but the injury resulting from his death to his family. 
