two years' training in the army for her youth; and if Germany delayed much longer, the French army would be almost as power- ful as the German. Across the eastern frontler, Russia was beginning to recover from the effects of her military defeat by Japan in 1904-5, and, under the anxious tutelage of both the French and the British War Offices, was preparing an army increase on a hitherto unapproached scale. If Ger- many was to dominate the world, it had be- come by 1914 a case of another successful coup like those of 1905 and 1908, with En- tente submission-or else war.
In the spring of 1918, Prince Lichnowsky. German ambassador to Great Britain at the outbreak of the war, made public memoranda confessing that Great Britain had steadily tried to bring about a "rap- prochement" with Germany and to bind the two nations in a more friendly rela- tionship. In his statement denying many of Prince Lichnowsky's statements, the Foreign Minister under whom he served, von Jagow, admitted the implication of the diplomatic history sketched above- namely, that Germany recognized that she could no longer dominate Europe in peace- ful diplomatic negotiations, and that she could regain or even strengthen her former position of domination only by war, or by threat of war.
These political and diplomatic develop- ments, however, had their roots in almost every phase of European activity. Particu- larly, they were made possible by the growth of the nationalistic impulse through- out the nineteenth century. At the close of the Napoleonic Wars, the partition of Europe was arranged with scant heed to the cultural demands of various suppressed na- tionalities. Within Austria-Hungary were many national elements with little in com- mon; the Balkan peninsula was a hotbed of racial groups, with now one in the sad- dle, now another, but with the powerful always repressing the weaker; neither France nor the inhabitants of Alsace-Lor- raine could rest contented while those prov- inces were a part of German culture; Russia might be Slavic, but some of her elements, for instance the Ukrainians and the Lith- uanians, had no desire to wrap up their destinies with those of the Great Russians; more than one hundred years of partition and dependence had failed to shake the longing of the Poles for a country and a literature of their own; and the geograph- ical boundaries of Italy were not broad enough to include those lands and peoples which inherently were a part of Italian na- tional life. Dominating all this smoulder- ing volcano was the so-called Pan-German movement a movement of a new and young nation which had developed its own na- tional life in so brilliant a fashion as virtually to assume the leadership of the world. but in which success had inculcated so heedless and so unscrupulous a national pride that Germany held itself justitied in forcing its civilization and culture upon all other peoples, no matter what the civil- ization and culture of the latter and no matter how distasteful to them might be the German idea.
Forming the frame for this ferment of unrestrainable forces were the industrial needs of the last twenty-five years. The extent to which economic competitions and aggressions were responsible for a situation which could make possible the outbreak of a world war is a matter of individual opin- ions, varying in accordance with the amount of influence assigned economic motives in one's philosophy of life. But it is undeni- able that the tremendously accelerated pro- duction due to new mechanical inventions
had made national markets no longer adequate for the great enterprises of the great nations, and the wealth and influence of those nations were dependent upon the extent of the new markets which they could control. Preferential tariffs; colonies and colonial expansions; access to the natural wealth of the great undeveloped lands of the earth, especially Africa and Siberia; the control of the important harbors of mari- time traffic, with their coaling facilities, and of international waterways and canals; the manipulation of international finance and banking all these aspirations were the pawns pitted against each other by the Great Powers of Europe on their chess- board of the world.
On June 28, 1914, the pan-Slav agitation in Servia came to inevitable fruition with the murder in Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia, of Archduke Franz Ferdinand the heir ap parent to the throne of Austria-Hungary.
THE FOURTEEN DAYS.
July 23, 1914.—Austria-Hungary delivers her expected ultimatum to Servia, making demands of which at least two cannot be granted without a virtual surrender of Ser- via to Austro-Hungarian domination. It is the first sight of the war-clouds.
July 24.-Germany supports Austria-Hun- gary and Russia supports Servia. France assures Russia of support. England works for a peaceful settlement.
July 25.-Servia replies to the ultimatum in a most conciliatory fashion, granting all but two of the Austrian demands. Servia begins mobilization and Russia secretly or ders partial mobilization. Austria-Hungary declares Servia's answer unsatisfactory.
July 27.-Germany announces that Rus- sian mobilization will be followed by Ger- man mobilization. Russia refuses England's request to postpone mobilization and an- nounces that she will not permit Servia to be crushed. Russian mobilization begins. The British fleet remains mobilized after naval manoeuvres.
July 28-Austria-Hungary declares war on Servia and proceeds with general mobili- zation. Russia announces to Germany that Russian mobilization will take place only against Austria-Hungary and not against Germany.
July 29.-Hostilities between Servia and Austria-Hungary begin. Germany holds a war council at Potsdam, warning that she will mobilize unless Russian mobilization France assures Russia of support. England declines to promise neutrality in case of a general European war.
July 30.-Austria-Hungary, alarmed, be- comes more conciliatory, and hints at ar- bitration. Russia threatens general as well as partial mobilization, and at midnight carries out the threat.
July 31.-Germany replies by an ultima- tum, demanding from Russia an agreement within twelve hours to countermand the Russian general mobilization. Germany asks France what France's course will be in case of a German-Russian war. England asks German guarantees of respect for Belgian neutrality, but Germany, as previously, re- fuses to commit herself. Belgium mobilizes.
August 1.-Russia makes no reply to the German ultimatum within the time-limit set. Germany undertakes not to attack France in case France will remain neutral. France informs Germany, in reply to the ultimatum of the previous day, that in case of a Ger- man-Russian War, France will act as her
own interests dictate. France orders general mobilization. Austria-Hungary is still con- ciliatory, but the quarrel has passed out of her hands. At 7:10 P. M., having received по answer to her ultimatum to Russia, Germany declares war on Russia.
August 2.-Germany demands from Bel- gium passage-way for her troops and sends forces into Luxemburg.
August 3.-Belgium refuses the German demand for passage-way. England informs Germany that violation of Belgian neutrality will bring England into the war. Citing alleged hostile acts by France, Germany de- clares war on France.
August 4-German troops enter Belgium", against Belgian resistance." England delivers an ultimatum to Germany, demanding the withdrawal of the German troops from Bel- gian soil. Germany refusing, the British ambassador demands his passports, and at midnight England declares war on Germany.
August 5.-Austria-Hungary declares war on Russia.
Declarations of war were made as fol-
Austria v. Belgium, August 28, 1914. Austria v. Japan, August 27, 1914. Austria v. Montenegro, August 9, 1914. Austria v. Russia, August 6, 1914. Austria v. Serbia, July 28, 1914. Brazil v. Germany, October 26, 1917. Bulgaria v. Serbia, October 14, 1915. China v. Austria, August 14, 1917. China v. Germany, August 14, 1917. Costa Rica v. Germany, May 23, 1918. Cuba v. Austria, December 16, 1917. Cuba v. Germany, April 7, 1917. France v. Austria, August 13, 1914. France v. Bulgaria, October 16, 1915. France v. Germany, August 3, 1914. France v. Turkey, November 5, 1914. Germany v. Belgium, August 4, 1914. Germany v. France, August 3, 1914. Germany v. Portugal, March 9, 1916. Germany v. Rumania, September 14, 1916. Germany v. Russia, August 1, 1914. Great Britain v. Austria, August 13, 1914. Great Britain v. Bulgaria, October 15, 1915.
Great Britain V. Germany, August 4, 1914.
Great Britain v. Turkey, November 5, 1914.
Greece (provisional government) v. Bul- garia, November 28, 1916.
Greece (provisional government) v. Ger- many, November 28, 1916.
Greece (Government of Bulgaria, July 2, 1917.
Greece (Government of Alexander) v. Germany, July 2, 1917.
Guatemala v. Austria, April 22, 1918. Guatemala v. Germany, April 22, 1918. Haiti v. Germany, July 12, 1918. Honduras v. Germany, July 19, 1918. Italy. Austria, May 24, 1915. Italy v. Bulgaria, October 19, 1914. Italy v. Germany, August 28, 1916. Italy v. Turkey, August 21, 1915. Japan v. Germany, August 23, 1914. Liberia v. Germany, August 4, 1917. Montenegro v. Austria, August 8, 1914. Monenegro v. Germany, August 9. 1914. Nicaragua v. Germany and her allies, may 7. 1918.
I'anama v. Austria, December 10, 1917. Panama v. Germany, April 7, 1917. Portugal v. Germany, November 23, 1914. (Resolution passed authorizing military in- tervention as ally of Great Britain.)
Portugal V. Germany, May 19, 1915. (Military aid granted.)
Roumania v. Austria, August 27. 1916. (Allies of Austria also consider it a declara- tion.)
Russia v. Bulgaria, October 19, 1915. Russia v. Turkey. November 3, 1914. San Marino v. Austria, May 24, 1915. Serbia v. Bulgaria, October 16, 1915. Serbia v. Germany, August 6, 1914. Serbia v. Turkey, December 2, 1914. Siam v. Austria. July 21, 1917. Siam v. Germany, July 21, 1917. Turkey v. Allies, November 23, 1914. Turkey v. Roumania, August 29, 1916. United States v. Austria-Hungary. cember 7, 1917.
United States v. Germany, April 6, 1917. Severance of diplomatic relations has been as follows:
Austria against Japan, August 26, 1914. Austria against Portugal, March 16. 1916. Austria against Serbia, July 26, 1914. Austria against United States, April 8. 1917. Bolivia against Germany, April 14. 1917. Brazil against Germany, April 11, 1917. China against Germany, March 14, 1917. Costa Rica against Germany, September 21, 1917.
Ecuador against Germany, December 7,
At war with Germany or her allies on June 1. 1918:
Serbia, France, Great Britain, Monte- negro, Japan, Belgium. Italy, San Marino, Portugal, Greece. Cuba, Panama, Siam, Liberia, China, Brazil, Guatemala. Nica- ragua, Costa Rica, and the United States.
The various belligerents, soon after their respective entrances into the war. published their own official versions of the circum- stances which led to their participation. These versions were in the forms of book- lets, and were named by the color of the covers, as follows:
Blue Books, England and Servia: Gray Book, Belgium: Green Book. Italy; Orange, Russia and Holland: Red, Austria-Hun- gary: Red, White and Blue. United States; White, Germany and Portugal; Yellow, France.
The vastness of Russia's population com- pelled Germany to assume the aggressive immediately upon the outbreak of the War. For if Russia should be unhindered in gath- ering her vast man-power, her armies alone would be thrice the size of the German. Moreover, Russia lay to the east of Germany and France to the west, so that Germany was compelled to wage two campaigns simul- taneously.
On the other hand, the mobilizing re- sources of Russia were notoriously scant. According to German calculations, it would be six weeks or two months before the Rus- sian army could arrive near the German border in sufficient numbers to compel the diversion of a great part of Germany's strength to the east-all the more since Austria-Hungary was counted upon to keep busy the first armies which Russia should be able to mobilize.
Thus the German plan was to crush France within six weeks or two months; then to turn her undivided strength to crush Russia, held in check until that time by Austria-Hungary; after which there would be ample time to turn attention to the British, who had adopted no policy of uni- versal military training and who therefore could not present an army of more than several hundred thousand until 1915.
Of the three roads to Paris open to Ger- many, the road via Switzerland presented too many material difficulties to be con- sidered. The most practicable road would have seemed at first blush to be that through Alsace and Lorraine. But the country in that section was hilly and therefore both unsuited for the rapid movement of troops and also admirably suited for defence. Moreover, it was from this quarter that France had long expected attack, and along the Alsace-Lorraine frontier France had erected and connected the four mighty for- tresses of Toul, Epinal, Verdun and Belfort. The reduction of these strongholds would immeasurably delay the German plans. Fin- ally, there was the probability that the Alsace-Lorraine frontier was not long enough to avoid crowding, and hence delay, in thrusting through it the vast hordes of men which Germany intended to use against France.
Therefore the road via Belgium and Lux- emburg was chosen. Luxemburg, although technically neutral, had no army and could not delay the German advance. The viola- tion of Belgian neutrality would constitute an act of glaring international immorality, but Germany was under the spell of that system of thought which yields to no scru- ples in accomplishing the task ahead of it. Similarly, the violation of Belgian neutrality would ensure England's entrance into the war; but, as we have seen, England was committed to France by a close defensive alliance. Moreover, England had consum- mated with France in 1912 a secret under- standing, probably known to Germany, whereby England was at once to go to France's assistance in case France were at- tacked by Germany, irrespective of the viola- tion of Belgium's neutrality. Furthermore, there was on the Belgian frontier but one French fortress of strength on the road to Paris. The country was level and admirably suited for the rapid advance of huge bodies of troops, even for the use of cavalry on a large scale. Finally, for years Germany had been constructing to the Belgian frontier a great net-work of military railroads, which would land the German armies almost in- tact at the boundaries of King Albert's kingdom.
Belgium, of course, was expected to resist to the utmost, but the Belgian army was weak and Germany anticipated little delay in rolling it back to the west, beyond the area of Germany's passage-way into France. True, several of the Belgian fortresses lay in that passage-way, but recent experiments had convinced the German General Staff that their high explosives and large caliber guns could render even the strongest fort- resses helpless in a short space of time.
As Germany's plan was inevitably aggres- sive, France's plan was inevitably defensive. She must attempt to stave off the first rush of the German cohorts, always retreating rather than risk surrender or encirclement, until Russia's blows in the east could re- lieve the pressure. If France could stave off defeat for some months, the British man- power also could make itself effective.
England's plan was naturally to send as many reinforcements as possible to the as- sistance of France and to speed the develop- ment of an army large enough to turn the scales of battle. In the meantime, the British fleet would completely control the seas and impose upon Germany a blockade the strictness of which would tell upon Germany's strength as the months rolled up.
Russia, as we have seen, was to mobilize as quickly as possible. Her first armies would have to be sent against the offensive to be expected from Austria-Hungary to the south; and after the pressure in the south was relieved. Russia must hasten to form armies on the German frontier in order to relieve the pressure on France.
Austria-Hungary, finally, could not alto- gether neglect the war she had started with Servia, but obviously was to throw most of her strength against Russia so that her ally would not be interrupted while in the pro- cess of annihilating France.
THE WAR, 1914
IN THE WEST
The German Advance into Belgium.-In- stead of sending one army after another directly toward Paris, Germany dispatched her first forces due west across Belgium. Thus, the first troops marching through Belgium would reach the point farthest west, and be ready to turn south, at the same time that the last troops would be en- tering Belgium, so that all the troops could then march in practically a straight line toward Paris. The very first troops sent into Belgium, however, were used for the reduction of that country. They were un- der the command of von Emmich, and had been mobilized within several days, whereas the complete German mobilization was not finished until about August 12.
The three great Belgian fortresses were Liège, Namur and Antwerp, of which only the first two barred the road toward France. Antwerp being on the sea. Von Emmich made all haste for the first of these, ar- rived before its gates on August 5, and im- mediately demanded its surrender. Mean- while, the Belgian army of some 125,000 had been mobilized, portions of it were in a position to assist Liège, and when the German demand for surrender was peremp- torily refused, the first great battle of the World War opened.
The Fall of Liège and Namur.-Von Em- mich's troops were repulsed in their attacks on the fortress on August 5, and he was compelled to await the arrival of his ar- tillery on the following day. On August 6, also, new quotas of the German army ar- rived, flanked the city, and attacked in force while the heavy guns demolished the forts. On the next day, two of the strongest forts of Liège were rendered helpless, so that the supporting Belgian troops retired and left further defence solely to the garrison. On August 7, the city was occupied, the bridges across the Meuse fell into the hands of the invaders, the road south was thus opened, and von Emmich went ahead with greater deliberation, while the next German army
(the First), under von Kluck, crossed the Meuse and proceeded on its way. Heroic re- sistance allowed the garrison of Liège to re- sist until August 14, when the last fort fell before the devastating fire of the German heavy guns. Liège had inspired the world with the heroism of Belgium, but had not delayed the German plans.
The next Belgian fortress to be overcome was Namur, to the southwest of Liège, and more strongly fortified and defended. Von Kluck's army had marched due west, and it was the German Second Army, under von Bülow, which reached the Belgian lines in front of Namur on August 18. The entire Belgian army was stationed before the city, but the greater size of the German forces enabled them to flank the Belgians, and to compel them to retire to avoid encirclement. By August 20, the Belgian army, almost without striking a blow, had been forced back into Antwerp, safe, but no longer in the path of the Germans. Meanwhile, the withdrawal of Albert's forces allowed the capital, Brussels, and Louvain, to fall with- out a struggle into the hands of von Kluck's First Army.
The Germans had learned a lesson at Liège, and von Bülow did not attempt to reduce Namur until his heavy guns were in position. The bombardment opened on August 20, and its ceaseless steel rain re- duced the fortress to virtual impotence within three days. On August 24, the Ger- mans occupied the town, and on August 26, the fortress. Namur had been counted upon by the Allies for a more longer resistance, and its fall within several days sadly dis- arranged all the Allied plans, placing in dire peril the British and French troops which were being assembled near the French bor- der to meet the invaders. Meantime, the last of the German forces entering Belgium, the German Third Army, under von Hausen, had also crossed the frontier, and it started south at the same time that the First and Second Armies to the west wheeled, almost at a right angle, and likewise started for Paris. To the east of the Third Army, the Fourth and Fifth Armies, under the Duke of Württemberg and the Crown Prince, re- spectively, crossed through Luxemburg, and also drove south.
The German Advance through France. Meanwhile, France seems not to have re- alized the seriousness of the thrust through Belgium and Luxemburg. At all events, she concentrated most of her forces along the Alsace-Lorraine frontier, according to pre- arranged schedule, and even entered upon an advance into this German territory, where within three weeks French troops occupied Saarburg, Mülhausen and Aitkirch, before being driven back by the Germans. By August 20, however, the French realized the peril, hastily abandoned the eastern offen- sive, and made all haste to withdraw all their forces to the north.
The British Expeditionary Force, some 100,000 strong, had landed in France on August 18, and by August 23 had marched north to the Belgian border at Mons, form- ing the extreme left of the Allied forces, opposite the German First Army. On its east was the French Fifth Army, under Lanrezac, just below Namur, joined to the British at Charleroi, and facing the German Second Army. But further to the east, the German Third Army was driving ahead un- opposed, since the French Fourth Army to the east was fully occupied with the German Fourth Army.
When the Battle of Mons-Charleroi opened, therefore, on August 23, the right flank of
the French Fifth Army had to be extended beyond the safety point, to prevent flanking movements by the German Third Army. The German Second Army thus had little dim- culty in driving back the French center and left, so that the French had to retreat, leav- ing the British right flank exposed.
The British had resisted stubbornly at Mons, although steadily driven back by the superior numbers of the German First Army, until they learned that the French had retreated and that a German corps was swinging into position in their rear. A pre- cipitate retreat was therefore ordered, which compelled a further French retreat, and for ten days the British were mercilessly driven helter-skelter back upon Paris by the alternate hammer-blows of first the German First and then the German Second Army. It was a complete rout, cutting down the British forces to about half their strength, breaking up their formation, and resulting in complete exhaustion but in an almost miraculous escape from utter destruction. The French Fifth Army likewise retreated precipitately, although preserving a better semblance of order, and punishing the enemy in some rear-guard engagements, notably at Guise and St. Quentin. All this time, the French commander-in-chief, Joffre, was fran- tically rushing up reinforcements from the Alsace-Lorraine frontier, but the withdrawal of the British and of Lanrezac had com- pelled the withdrawal, although in good order, of all the French forces west of Ver- dun, comprising the French Fourth and Third Armies.
It seemed as though the German plan of campaign was bearing fruit and that only complete disaster lay ahead of the Allies. For it was not until September 3 that the British were able to rally sufficiently to offer resistance once more and that the French reinforcements were able to join the Fifth, Fourth and Third Armies in full strength; and by that time the Germans had advanced more than one hundred miles into French territory and were as far south as Paris itself.
Battle of the Marne.-The retreat of the British and of the French Fifth Army had left Paris exposed to capture, since there was not sufficient time to station north of Paris the troops diverted by Joffre from the Alsace-Lorraine frontier, and they could be placed only to the east of the French capital. But the German General Staff rightly placed the capture of the Allied army above the capture of Paris, and von Kluck swerved in front of the city, which he could readily have taken, and passed southeast of it. the meantime, the seat of the French Gov- ernment had been removed to Bordeaux.) Thus on September 4, when the Allies were at last ready to cease retreating and to give battle, the opposing forces were facing each other south of the Marne River and north of the Seine. It must not be forgotten that the Battle of the Marne thus took place along a line between Paris and Verdun, run- ning to the south and east of Paris. For the four great French fortresses on the Alsace- Lorraine frontier had held, and the German Sixth and Seventh Armies had not been able to break through to aid the five armies which had advanced west of Verdun.
To some extent, the reinforcements gath- ered by Joffre had been added to the French armies previously formed. But most of them went into the formation of a new army, the French Seventh Army, stationed just north of the Seine between the French Fifth and Fourth Armies, and placed under the com mand of General Ferdinand Foch. However,
the French formed more than one new army. By troops rushed up from their African possessions and by members of the Paris garrison, another army, the French Sixth Army, was organized in Paris, was placed under General Manoury, and, when Joffre at last ordered a general advance on September 5, was marched out to attack the German First Army on its western flank.
Von Kluck had anticipated something of a move against his right wing, and, as he swung below Paris to pursue the fast-re- treating British, he had left one army corps along the Ourcq River, around Meaux, north- east of Paris. But Manoury greatly out- numbered this single corps, completely de- feated it, put it to rout on September 5, and on September 6 made for von Kluck's rear.
Only one road then lay open to von Kluck. To avoid being taken in the rear and thus disrupting the entire German line, he clev- erly turned in a complete circle and retraced his steps in order to drive Manoury back. Indeed, on September 7 and 8, von Kluck arrived in force opposite Manoury and easily crushed the new French army, threatening to hurl it back into Paris, whence it had started. But this retirement cf von Kluck back to the northwest compelled a shift in the entire German line; for if it had re mained stationary, a serious gap would have come into existence between von Kluck and the German Second Army on his right. Therefore, the Second Army also shifted to the west, leaving a gap in the German lines between the Second and the Third Armies. And when von Kluck fell upon Manoury, the German Third Army, instead of also shift- ing to the west to close the gap, attacked in force the French Seventh Army under Foch, in the hope of breaking the center of the French line.
But the westward shift of the German Second Army allowed the French Fifth Army, facing it, to send some reinforcements to Foch, who on September 7, 8 and 9 was being steadily driven back. And it was these reinforcements which suddenly turned the tide of battle and miraculously saved France. For Foch's uncanny penetration showed him a weak point in the east wing of the German army which was driving him back, and on the afternoon of September 9 he hurled his reinforcements at this Achille's heel of Germany's armor.
The fresh French troops cut through the east wing of the German Third Army as a knife cuts through cheese, and in several hours the entire German Third Army was being flanked on its left. At the same time, Foch attacked it in the center, so that von Hausen could not send reinforcements to his bending left. Before midnight on Sep- tember 9, the entire German Third Army. holding the center of the German line, bad been driven back and Foch was pouring his troops into the hole thus opened up.
On September 10, Foch turned to the west and threatened to flank the German Second and First Armies. The latter had not only to protect themselves, but also to lend as- sistance to von Hausen, in order to enable him to retreat in good order; and thus they were in no position to withstand a further attack, especially since by this time the British had once more become effective and were streaming through the gap left when the German Second Army shifted to the west and the German Third Army remained sta- tionary to attack Foch. Von Hausen, there- fore, was compelled overnight to call off his drive upon Manoury, and when September 10 dawned, the German armies were in full
flight back to the Aisne, where they dug themselves in. France had been saved by the "Miracle of the Marne."
The Race to the Sea.-After one week's attempt to break the German lines along the Aisne, Joffre discovered that the trenches were too strong to be captured by storm; so he inaugurated a vast encircling movement to the west, in order to occupy the land between the opposing armies and the sea. At the same time, the Germans realized the value of this territory, both to prevent be- ing flanked and also to gain submarine bases along the Belgian seacoast. Hence both the Allies and the Germans withdrew forces from the Alsace-Lorraine frontier, adding in- crements to their west wings, until these successive additions occupied all the land to the sea, and the battle-line of trenches reached all the way from the ocean to the border of Switzerland. However, Lille, the other great French fortress on the Belgian frontier, had been invested, and it fell on October 10.
In the meantime, Maubeuge, the one great French fortress on the Belgian frontier, which had been in the path of the German invasion, had also been invested and it had fallen on September 7.
Battle of the Aisne.-The Aisne River is a sluggish canalized river about 170 miles long flowing generally westward into the Oise through a valley from half a mile to two miles wide between plateaus 400 feet high on each side. While on the drive to Paris the Germans had prepared a strong position on the northern plateau upon which to make a stand in case of possible retreat. crete platforms had been built for heavy guns, and commodious trenches with over- head protection against shrapnel had been constructed for the infantry. The right of the position rested on the Noyon Hills west of the Oise, north of its junction with the Aisne. From this point the line ran east along the Aisne about forty miles and then Four south by east by Reims to Verdun. railways ran back from this position into Belgium and a fifth ran east and west at a convenient distance in the rear of the lines. The German retreat abruptly halted Sept. 12 at Soissons, where the river is about sixty yards wide. Here the armies were deadlocked from the Noyon Hills to the Swiss frontier. The allies sent forces to turn the German right and strike the railways in their rear, but each expe- dition resulted only in a pitched battle and the extension of the German lines north- ward. By Oct. 7, the 25th day of the fighting along the Aisne, the lines had been prolonged to La Bassee, ten miles from the Belgian frontier, and the net result of the fighting after ten months was the exten- sion of the lines from the confluence of the Aisne and Oise rivers into Flanders and as close to the English Channel coast as operations of the British navy would per- mit. This line was roughly marked by the towns of Vermelles, Armentieres, Ypres, Bixshoote and Dixmude, which became the French reserve scenes of fierce struggles.
troops, detachments from the French active army, the British expeditionary force, Brit- Ish Indians, Senegalese, and Turcos went to make up the prolongation of the allies' front.
On the southeast end of the German line the Crown Prince in September sent out several army corps to cut the line south of Verdun, but only succeeded in reaching St. Mihiel, which during the first half of 1915 continued to be a starting point for aggressive movements.
« PředchozíPokračovat » |