 | Aaron Burr - 1808 - 552 str.
...error of judgment; but it is an error committed in the direct exercise'of their judicial functions. The present indictment charges the prisoner with levying...witnesses. It is not proved by a single witness. The presence of the accused has been stated to be an essential component part of the overt act in this... | |
 | 1808 - 652 str.
...error of judgment; but it is an error committed in the direct exercise of their judicial functions. The present indictment charges the prisoner with levying...witnesses. It is not proved by a single witness. The presence of the accused has been stated to be an essential component part of the overt act in this... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - 1812 - 516 str.
...error of judgment, but it is an error committed in the direct exercise of their judicial functions. The present indictment charges the prisoner with levying...States, and alleges an overt act of levying war. That t)vert act must be proved, according to the mandates of the constitution and of the act of congress,... | |
 | John Marshall - 1839 - 762 str.
...of their judicial functions. The present indictment charges tlie prisoner with levyins war aeriin-t the United States, and alleges an overt act of levying war. That overt act mast be proved, according to the mandates of the constitution and of the act of congress, by two witnesses.... | |
 | United States. Congress - 1852 - 772 str.
...error of judgment, but it is an error committed 'n the direct exercise of their judicial functions. The present indictment charges the prisoner with levying...proved according to the mandates of the Constitution of the act of Congress, by two witnesses. It is not proved by a single witness. The presence of the... | |
 | United States. Congress - 1852 - 774 str.
...error of judgment, but it is an error committed n the direct exercise of their judicial functions. The present indictment charges the prisoner with levying...overt act must be proved according to the mandates of he Constitution of the act of Congress, by two witnesses. It is not proved by a single witness. The... | |
 | Joseph Gales - 1852 - 774 str.
...error of judgment, but it is an error committed in the direct exercise of their judicial functions. The present indictment charges the prisoner with levying...States, and alleges an overt act of levying war. That over! act must be proved according to the mandates of the Constitution of the act of Congress, by two... | |
 | Illinois State Bar Association - 1901 - 780 str.
...to consume further time for the ruling of the Court upon testimony as it may be offered, and says: "The present indictment charges the prisoner with...witnesses. It is not proved by a single witness." The Court then concludes its luminous, masterful and thorough examination of all the questions discussed... | |
 | Isaac Jenkinson - 1902 - 402 str.
...profession, but almost unintelligible to the general public. We give only its conclusion. He says: "The present indictment charges the prisoner with...constitution and of the act of congress, by two witnesses. IT 18 NOT PROVED BY A SINGLE WITNESS. The presence of the accused has been stated to be an essential component... | |
 | John Marshall - 1903 - 832 str.
...error of judgment; but it is an error committed in the direct exercise of their judicial functions. The present indictment charges the prisoner with levying...witnesses. It is not proved by a single witness. The presence of the accused has been stated to be an essential component part of the overt act in this... | |
| |
The present indictment charges the prisoner with levying war against the United States, and alleges an overt act of levying war. That overt act must be proved, according to the mandates of the constitution and of the act of Congress, by two witnesses.... 
