American Law Reports Annotated, Svazek 162Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1946 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-3 z 95
Strana 17
positive proof as to the signals , but it was a question for the jury as to whether or not the witnesses who did not hear the signals would have heard them if given , and under our scintilla rule the defendants were not entitled to the ...
positive proof as to the signals , but it was a question for the jury as to whether or not the witnesses who did not hear the signals would have heard them if given , and under our scintilla rule the defendants were not entitled to the ...
Strana 30
... positively that the bell was kept ringing contin- ually . While the testimony of these witnesses , testifying positively to the fact of which their situation at the time gave them positive knowledge , entitles their testimony to greater ...
... positively that the bell was kept ringing contin- ually . While the testimony of these witnesses , testifying positively to the fact of which their situation at the time gave them positive knowledge , entitles their testimony to greater ...
Strana 33
... positive or negative in character , still we think the weight of judicial authority shows that such testimony is of such pro- bative value as to justify a jury in giving as much , or even greater , weight to it than to positive ...
... positive or negative in character , still we think the weight of judicial authority shows that such testimony is of such pro- bative value as to justify a jury in giving as much , or even greater , weight to it than to positive ...
Obsah
Introduction and survey | 10 |
Distinction between testimony that signals were not given | 22 |
Comparative probative force of testimony that signals were not given | 28 |
Autorská práva | |
Další části 1 nejsou zobrazeny.
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
action affirmed Ann Cas annotation App Div appeal applied bell bonds child claim Conflict of Laws Constitution contract convey covenant criminal crossing signals declarations declarations against interest defendant dence disqualified effect employee enforce estoppel evidence F Supp facie fact Federal statute grantor Headnote hear heard held infra insured interest Iowa judge judgment jurisdiction jury land lease legitimate liquidated damages ment Mo App NE2d negative ness Okla opinion option overtime P. R. Co party penal penalty peremptory challenges person plaintiff positive presumption probative force provision purchase question quitclaim deed reason restraints on alienation rule against perpetuities rung signals were given sounded St Rep stat statute of limitations statutory suit supra Supreme Court SW2d testi testimony Tex Civ App tion train approached trial United validity violation whistle witness not dealt writ of certiorari York