Hearing on H.R. 758, the Truth in Employment Act of 1996: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Employer-Employee Relations of the Committee on Education and the Workforce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, First Session, Hearing Held in Washington, DC, October 9, 1997, Svazek 4

Přední strana obálky
 

Vybrané stránky

Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny

Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví

Oblíbené pasáže

Strana 79 - A person may be the servant of two masters, not joint employers, at one time as to one act, provided that the service to one does not involve abandonment of the service to the other.
Strana 61 - ... firms, including 8,000 of America's leading general contracting firms. They are engaged in the construction of the nation's commercial buildings, shopping centers, factories, warehouses, highways, bridges, tunnels, airports, water works facilities, waste treatment facilities, dams, water conservation projects, defense facilities, multi-family housing projects and site preparation/utilities installation for housing development.
Strana 80 - [i]he statute is founded on the belief that an employee may legitimately give allegiance to both a union and an employer. To the extent that may appear to give rise to a conflict, it is a conflict that was resolved by Congress long since in favor of the right of employees to organize.
Strana 63 - AGC represents more than 33,000 firms, including 7,500 of America's leading general contracting firms.
Strana 84 - ... Nothing in the law precludes an employer from discharging an employee who is insubordinate or incompetent. Nor does the law prohibit an employer from refusing to hire an employee for a valid businessrelated reason, if, for example, the employer concludes, based on nondiscriminatory grounds, that the applicant cannot perform the job adequately. Although employees have a protected right to communicate with each other on the subject of union organization, the law also permits an employer to promulgate...
Strana 76 - ... Congress - about what they contend is the unfairness of salting. At bottom, however, the real objection of these employers is that the law prohibits them from refusing to hire and from discharging employees simply because they intend to participate in union organizing. There is nothing unfair in mat prohibition, and it is consistent with the basic policies of the Act.
Strana 73 - ... National Labor Relations Board. In 1959, Congress enacted Section 8(f) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 USC §158(f), ("NLRA" or "Act"), permitting unions and employers in the construction industry to enter into prehire collective bargaining agreements (agreements entered into before the union can demonstrate that it represents a majority of the employer's employees, or even before any employees are hired), because Congress understood that "[r)epresentation elections in a large segment...
Strana 78 - Country Electric case. In that case, Town & Country, a very large, nonunion electrical contractor, acting through an employment agency, ran a newspaper advertisement announcing job opportunities for licensed electricians, and set up interviews in a hotel suite. Eleven members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers showed up for the interviews. Two were paid union organizers; the other nine were unemployed members. After learning that these eleven applicants were union members, the...
Strana 82 - The employer responded to the salting campaign by "referring to [the union] as organized crime trying to put him out of business." Id. The owner told the superintendent "to eliminate wherever possible any personnel that were affiliated with the union;" told the employees that "as long as he owned the Company it would never be union;" and instituted a "no-moonlighting" policy for the specific purpose of eliminating those participating in the salting program.
Strana 80 - Justice Breyer, speaking for the unanimous Court, asked and answered the question before the Court as follows: Can a worker be a company's "employee," within the terms of the National Labor Relations Act ... if, at the same time, a union pays that worker to help the union organize the company? We agree with the National Labor Relations Board that the answer is "yes.

Bibliografické údaje