 | Orville James Victor - 1861 - 586 str.
...a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so that rejecting the majority principle, anarcby or despotism in some form is all that is left. " I...forget the position assumed by some that Constitutional qnestions are to be decided by the Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that such decision must be binding,... | |
 | 1861 - 456 str.
...anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible : so that, rejecting the majority...anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left, ^f I do not forget the position assumed by some, that constitutional questions are to be decided by... | |
 | Ludwig Karl Aegidi - 1861 - 462 str.
...despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholl)' inadmissible ; so that, rejecting the majority principle,...anarchy Or despotism in some form is all that is left, ^f I do not forget the position assumed by some, that constitutional questions are to be decided by... | |
 | John Codman Hurd - 1862 - 888 str.
...decisions (ante, p. 245, n.). President Lincoln, in his Inaugural, March 4, 1861, has said : — " I do not forget the position assumed by some, that...deny that such decisions must be binding in any case opon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high... | |
 | Joseph Hartwell Barrett - 1864 - 544 str.
...anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a majority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible. So that, rejecting the majority...object of that suit, while they are also entitled to a very high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by all other departments of the Government... | |
 | Horace Greeley - 1864 - 694 str.
...anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible. So that, rejecting the majority...Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must bo binding in any case upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while they are also... | |
 | Edward McPherson - 1864 - 462 str.
...anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a> minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so that, rejecting the majority...decided by the Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that sach .decision must be binding, in any case, upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit,... | |
 | Henry Jarvis Raymond - 1864 - 514 str.
...anarchy or to depotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form ia all that is left. I do not forget the position assumed by some, that constitutional questions are... | |
 | Henry Jarvis Raymond - 1864 - 492 str.
...anarchy or to depotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism hi some form is all that is left. I do not forget the position assumed by some, that constitutional... | |
 | Joseph Hartwell Barrett - 1865 - 912 str.
...anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of n majority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible. So that, rejecting the majority...object of that suit, while they are also entitled to a very high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by all other departments of the Government;... | |
| |
Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left. 
