The American Journal of International Law, Svazek 2American Society of International Law, 1908 The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 8
... opinion . Public opinion , however , was not content to entrust itself wholly to nations and their rulers , but sought expression in individual and co - operative lines . In 1873 , the Institute of International Law was established at ...
... opinion . Public opinion , however , was not content to entrust itself wholly to nations and their rulers , but sought expression in individual and co - operative lines . In 1873 , the Institute of International Law was established at ...
Strana 20
... opinion forbade the bombardment of undefended ports . The fear , however , that such ports might be attacked and held , in order to enforce sub- mission , rendered a convention on this subject , even although declar- atory of ...
... opinion forbade the bombardment of undefended ports . The fear , however , that such ports might be attacked and held , in order to enforce sub- mission , rendered a convention on this subject , even although declar- atory of ...
Strana 23
... . The United States was not satisfied with cer- tain provisions of the convention and reserved the right to study the project in detail before expressing a final opinion . WORK OF THE SECOND HAGUE PEACE CONFERENCE 23.
... . The United States was not satisfied with cer- tain provisions of the convention and reserved the right to study the project in detail before expressing a final opinion . WORK OF THE SECOND HAGUE PEACE CONFERENCE 23.
Strana 32
... opinion on matters of fact , the signatory powers consider it useful that parties who have not been able to come to an agreement by diplomatic methods should , as far as circumstances allow , institute an International Commission of ...
... opinion on matters of fact , the signatory powers consider it useful that parties who have not been able to come to an agreement by diplomatic methods should , as far as circumstances allow , institute an International Commission of ...
Strana 43
... opinion . It is a very great progress , although it may appear almost imperceptible , and henceforth a state that sincerely wishes to avoid war can reply to its aggressor : " I appeal to the judges at The Hague . " 28 Baron Guillaume's ...
... opinion . It is a very great progress , although it may appear almost imperceptible , and henceforth a state that sincerely wishes to avoid war can reply to its aggressor : " I appeal to the judges at The Hague . " 28 Baron Guillaume's ...
Obsah
1 | |
29 | |
43 | |
78 | |
95 | |
121 | |
125 | |
152 | |
507 | |
518 | |
528 | |
562 | |
591 | |
607 | |
609 | |
646 | |
190 | |
257 | |
259 | |
271 | |
285 | |
295 | |
307 | |
309 | |
313 | |
357 | |
366 | |
387 | |
399 | |
409 | |
412 | |
439 | |
447 | |
448 | |
460 | |
476 | |
486 | |
490 | |
501 | |
649 | |
666 | |
669 | |
682 | |
708 | |
728 | |
729 | |
731 | |
731 | |
758 | |
772 | |
811 | |
823 | |
842 | |
866 | |
888 | |
893 | |
937 | |
975 | |
984 | |
985 | |
991 | |
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
adopted agreement apply appointed April April 24 Austria-Hungary authority Belgium belligerent blockade Britain British capture cargo Central American China citizens claims colonies commission Congress Constitution contracting convention of 1899 convention signed Costa Rica Court of Arbitration decision declaration decree delegation Department dipl dispute duties Empire enemy established exercise existing extradition fact force foreign France French Geneva Convention Germany Government Guatemala Hague Conference Honduras interests international law International Prize Court Japan judges judicial July jurisdiction justice maritime ment military municipal nations nature naval neutral power Norway obligatory arbitration opinion parties Peace Conference Permanent Court port practice present President principle prize court proposed protocol question recognized regulations relations Republic respect rules of international Russia Russo-Japanese war Second Hague Second Hague Conference seizure Senate ships Spain submitted Supreme Court Sweden Terlinden territory tion tribunal United United Kingdom Venezuela vote Washington