 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, John Leycester Adolphus, Thomas Flower Ellis - 1841 - 920 str.
...against WKLLS. (a) (,.-/. A- /•:. 469. H down. J839. GRKCO against WILLS: Thursday, May I'll. down. A party, who negligently or culpably stands by and...contradict, cannot afterwards dispute that fact in an action against the person whom he has himself assisted in deceiving. The defence here is, in substance,... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1842 - 822 str.
...plaintiff's property, cannot show the sale to have been fraudulent ; the fraud must be pleaded specially. A party who negligently or culpably stands by and...contradict, cannot afterwards dispute that fact in an action against the person whom he has himself assisted in deceiving; and this defence is admissible... | |
 | William Oldnall Russell - 1843 - 1068 str.
...с. Sanders, 6 A. & Б. 515, and Gregg o. Wells, 10 A. & E. 90, in which last case it was held that a party who negligently or culpably stands by and...contradict, cannot afterwards dispute that fact in an action against the person whom he has himself assisted in deceiving. CSG (A) Cooke v. Birt, 5 Taunt... | |
 | Herbert Broom - 1847 - 232 str.
...vendee, whom he thas himself assisted in deceiving :(_yj nor can a party, who negligently or culpably allows another to contract on the faith and understanding of a fact, which he can contradict, afterwards dispute that fact in an action against the person so contracting. 'r) But as against a mere... | |
 | William Francis Finlason - 1847 - 304 str.
...the principle would apply thus expressed in Wells v. Gregg, 10 A. & E., " That a party who (rightly or culpably) stands by and allows another to contract on the faith of a fact which he can contradict, cannot afterwards dispute that fact in an action against the person... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - 1848 - 764 str.
...at the same time (z). Indeed, the principle may be laid down still more broadly, as precluding any party, who negligently or culpably stands by and allows...and understanding of a fact which he can contradict, from disputing that fact in an action against the person whom he has himself assisted in deceiving... | |
 | 1848 - 1076 str.
...former is concluded from averring that case may be stated even more broadly than it is there laid down. A party who negligently or culpably stands by and...another to contract on the faith and understanding of ¡i fact which he can contradict, cannot afterwards dispute that fact in an action against the person... | |
 | Great Britain. Bail Court - 1850 - 808 str.
...stated more broadly by Lord Denman in the case of Gregg v. Wells (d), where his Lordship says, " that a party who negligently or culpably stands by and...contradict, cannot afterwards dispute that fact in an action against the person whom he has himself assisted in deceiving." Whether that rule has been... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1851 - 838 str.
...the trial, and the principle of that case may be stated even more broadly than it is there laid down. A party who negligently or culpably stands by and...dispute that fact in the action against the person who he himself assisted in deceiving. The defence here is, in substance, collusion between Durham and... | |
| |
A party who negligently or culpably stands by and allows another to contract on the faith and understanding of a fact which he can contradict, cannot afterwards dispute that fact in an action against the person whom he has himself assisted in deceiving. 
