 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Clement Tudway Swanston - 1822 - 648 str.
...entertained whether the receiver was not at liberty to publish them to the world, but he proceeds, " for, at most, the receiver has only a joint property with the writer." (a) No one can read the case of Thompson v. Stanhope without seeing that this was understood at that... | |
 | Great Britain - 1836 - 936 str.
...p*per may belong to him, but this does not give a license to any person whatsoever to publish them to the world, for at most the receiver has only a joint property with the writer." It is observable, that this case professes to proceed partly upon the statute, which gives only ч... | |
 | 1841 - 490 str.
...paper may belong to him; but this does not give a license to any person whatsoever to publish them to the world, for at most the receiver has only a joint property with the writer." We may certainly argue a fortiori that the member of the congregation, who hears the sermon, has no... | |
 | George Harris - 1847 - 586 str.
...paper may belong to him ; but this does not give a license to any person whatsoever to publish them to the world, for at most the receiver has only a joint property with the writer. " It has been insisted on by the defendant's counsel that this is a sort of work which does not come... | |
 | George Ticknor Curtis - 1847 - 490 str.
...the paper may belong to him ; but this does not give a license to any person whatsoever to publish it to the world, for at most the receiver has only a joint property with the writer.i The objection was also raised, that the letters were only on familiar subjects, and the book... | |
 | John Scott, Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1865 - 566 str.
...it may have got into his hands. Lord Ilardwicke. in" Pope v. Curl, 2 Atk. 3-Í2, lays it down that "at most, the receiver has only a joint property with the writer." And this was acted upon by Lord Apsley, C., in Thompson v. Stanhope, Ambler 737, and by Lord Eldon,... | |
 | 1888 - 556 str.
...property in the receiver. Possibly the property in the paper may belong to him, but this does not give license to any person whatsoever to publish them (the...receiver has only a joint property with the writer." Thompson v. Stanhope was the case of the celebrated Chesterfield letters, in which Lord Bathurst continued... | |
 | John Shortt - 1871 - 824 str.
...paper may belong to him, but this does not give a licence to any person whatsoever to publish them to the world, for at most the receiver has only a joint property with the writer." And to the objection insisted on by the defendant's counsel that this was a sort of work which did... | |
 | Appleton Morgan - 1875 - 538 str.
...paper may belong to him, but this does not give a license to any person whatsoever to publish them to the world, for at most the receiver has only a joint property with the writer." And to the objection insisted on by the defendant's counsel, that this was a sort of work which did... | |
 | 1912 - 1146 str.
...paper may belong to him; but this does not give a license to any person whatsoever to publish them to the world, for at most the receiver has only a joint property with the writer. * * • It has been Insisted • * that this Is a sort of work which •For other cases see same topic... | |
| |
I am of opinion that it is only a special property in the receiver, possibly the property of the paper may belong to him ; but this does not give a license to any person whatsoever to publish them to the world, for at most the receiver has only a joint... 
