§ 64. bill, the drawer is not a holder of the bill, vide § 2, and has no right of action against the acceptor on the bill, and till delivery of the acceptance to the payee there is no completed contract between the acceptor and the payee; the acceptance in such a case may be altered, because the Stamp Act does not apply to an uncompleted contract. (6.) Where a material alteration is made before issue, and assented to by all parties liable on the bill-e.g., the holder and the acceptor, in the case of a bill payable to a third party, the new contract is valid under this section, but after issue the Stamp Act, vide supra, prevents any material alteration being made, even with the assent of all parties; but if the parties liable have assented they are apparently liable on the bill as unaltered, because this Act declares that a bill materially altered shall be avoided, except against those parties thereto who have assented; and the Stamp Act cannot apparently be pleaded, because the original bill being still in force, it cannot be objected that it is not properly stamped. The bill, as altered, cannot be sued on, and it is pars judicis to notice the want of the Stamp. (c.) Where the parties liable have not assented, the bill is avoided, not discharged, and the holder can sue on the original debt. (d.) In such a case the objection that the bill is not stamped cannot be stated against a holder in due course, because his right is to the bill as unaltered. Besides the alterations stated in this subsection, the following alterations are material :—The substitution of one drawer for another, Fleming v. Scott, 1st July, 1823, 2 Sh. 446; the alteration of the name of an indorsee, M'Ara v. Watson, 3rd June, 1823, 2 Sh. 360; the erasure of the name of the acceptor and writing another above it, M'Ewan v. Graham, 21st Nov. 1833, 12 Sh. 110; an alteration in the consideration, Knill v. Williams, 10 East. 431. (e.) A bill is not materially altered where a mere correction is made, Brutt v. Picard, R. and M. 37, nor where a note is added, which does not change the effect of a bill, but merely explains it-e.g., the addition of the words jointly and severally to the acceptance of a Scotch bill was held not to avoid it, because the acceptors were already liable jointly and severally, Acceptance and Payment for Honour. $ 64, honour supra 65. (1.) Where a bill of exchange has been protested Acceptance for for dishonour by non-acceptance (a), or protested for Protest. better security (b), and is not overdue (c), any person (d), not being a party already liable thereon (e), may, with the consent of the holder (f), intervene and accept the bill supra protest (g), for the honour of any party liable thereon (h), or for the honour of the person for whose account the bill is drawn (i). (2.) A bill may be accepted for honour for part only of the sum for which it is drawn (j). 3.) An acceptance for honour supra protest in order to be valid must (k) (a.) be written on the bill, and indicate that it is an acceptance for honour: (b.) be signed by the acceptor for honour: (4.) Where an acceptance for honour does not expressly state for whose honour it is made, it is deemed to be an acceptance for the honour of the drawer (1). $ 65. (5.) Where a bill is payable after sight is accepted for honour, its maturity is calculated from the date of the noting for non-acceptance, and not from the date of the acceptance for honour (m). (a.) Vide § 43. (b.) Vide § 51 (5). (c.) Vide § 14 and 45 (2). (d.) Vide § 2. Where a bill bears the name of a referee, in case of need, the holder is not bound to resort to him, even any other person offers to accept for honour, and he agrees to take his acceptance, vide § 15. if (e.) Vide § 2. The drawee also may accept for honour of any party liable on the bill, because till acceptance he is not liable thereon. There may be several acceptors for honour, either of the same or different parties liable on the bill. (f.) The consent of the holder, vide § 2, is required even in the case of an acceptance for honour being offered by the drawee. If he takes an acceptance for honour, he cannot sue the parties liable in recourse to him, until the maturity of the bill and non-payment by the drawee or the acceptor for honour, Chitty on Bills, 11th Edit. p. 244. (g.) The bill must be protested either for non-acceptance, vide § 43, or for better security, vide § 51 (5), and if this be omitted, an acceptance for honour by a drawee will probably be treated as an indorsement, vide § 56, and the addition of the words for the honour of A. B., as a mere statement that he is an accommodation party, but he will not have the rights of an acceptor for honour. An acceptance for honour by a person, not the drawee, without the taking of a protest will be invalid, because no one is entitled to accept a bill except the drawee, vide § 17, and his acceptance cannot be treated as an acceptance for honour, because the essential preliminary of a protest has been omitted. Protest must be made on the day of the dishonour by non-acceptance, vide § 51 (4), and in the manner provided in § 57 (6-9), and § 94. (h.) The acceptance cannot be made for the honour o drawee, who has not accepted, whether he be under an obligation to accept or not, because he is not liable on the bill, nor for the honour of an indorser who has indorsed without recourse, vide § 16, or as agent, or in a representative capacity, vide § 26, but in the latter case it may be made for the honour of his principal or the corporation he represents. It cannot be made for the honour of an indorser who has negotiated the bill back to the holder, nor for any party against whom recourse has been lost by failure duly to negotiate, vide § 45, 46, 49, 50, 51, or whose obligation has been waived, vide § 62, or signature cancelled, § 63. It seems doubtful, whether in the case of a bill drawn payable per advice, the drawee is entitled to accept or pay for the honour of the drawee supra protest. These words, per advice, seem to prohibit the drawee from accepting or paying, except on receipt of a letter of advice, and the drawee is thereby forbidden to apply the drawer's funds, which either are or may come into his hands before maturity in payment of the bill. The holder of the bill may be barred from claiming payment by some agreement between him and the drawer. It is different in the case of a third party accepting or paying for the honour of the drawer of such a bill. The acceptor for honour succeeds to the rights of the holder against the drawer, and if he have no rights, the acceptor and payer for honour will be in no better position than an indorsee with note of the objection to the holder's title. An acceptor for honour does not become entitled to insist on paying the bill at maturity, and the holder by taking such an acceptance, is not relieved from the duty of giving notice, vide § 48. If notice of dishonour be not given, the acceptor for honour loses his right of recourse against the person for whose honour he has accepted, because the only right which he has against him is derived through the holder, vide § 68 (5). (i.) E.g., where the drawee is directed to place the sum for which the bill is drawn to the account of the principal of the person who draws the bill. (j.) A partial acceptance is the only qualified acceptance which a holder may take from a drawee, unless with the § 65. § 65. Liability of acceptor for honour. assent of the drawer; but, in the case of an acceptance for honour, it is not competent for the holder, with or without the drawer's assent, to take an acceptance for honour qualified except as to the sum. (k.) The formal requisites of an acceptance for honour, which has been preceded by a protest, vide § 50 (7 & 8), are(1.) That it be written (or printed, vide § 2). (2.) That it be on the bill. (3.) That it indicate that it is an acceptance for honour. No special form of words is necessary. The usual form is, "Accepted for the honour of A. B. supra protest," or Accepted S. P.," Thomson on Bills, p. 323. It is not enacted in this case that, as in the case of an ordinary acceptance, the signature is sufficient. It is not necessary that it bear the name of the person for whose honour it is made. (4.) That it be signed by the acceptor. As to the requisites of the signature, vide note on §§ 17 and 91 (1). Formerly, it was necessary that the acceptance for honour should be made in presence of a notary, and that an Act of Honour should be executed; but this is not declared to be requisite by this Act. In the case of an acceptance supra protest made abroad, the law of the country where it is made regulates its requisites, vide § 72 (1). It is, however, competent to execute an act of honour. (7.) This applies even though the acceptance supra protest be written under the name of an indorser with the view of indicating that the acceptance is for his honour. The only prejudice that an acceptor for honour suffers from his contract being deemed to be made on behalf of the drawer is that he cannot recover from the indorser the charges to which he has been put by so accepting, unless he can prove, otherwise than by the bill, that he had authority so to accept for him. (m.) The date in the protest for non-acceptance is evidence of the date of presentment for acceptance, while the date of acceptance for honour is immaterial. 66. (1.) The acceptor for honour of a bill by accepting it engages that he will, on due presentment, pay |