Treaties and Executive Agreements: Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Eighty-fifth Congress, First Session, on S.J. Res. 3, Proposing an Amendment to the Constitution of the United States Relating to the Legal Effect of Certain Treaties and Other International Agreements. June 25, 1957U.S. Government Printing Office, 1958 - Počet stran: 480 Considers constitutional amendment to require treaties or agreements to be ratified by the Senate and to be implemented by enabling legislation. a. Curtis Reid v. Clarice B. Covert, Supreme Court documents regarding decision on civilian trial versus court-martial for civilian murderer of military officer, June 10, 1957 (p. 85-174). b. Power Authority of the State of New York v. FPC, DC Court of Appeals decision on Niagara River power project construction license, June 20, 1957 (p. 175-203). c. "Bricker Amendment: Views of Deans and Professors of Law" by Committee for Defense of Constitution (p. 206-407). Includes the following documents. |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 3
... language which might be interpreted as invalidating treaty provisions on matters not within the expressly delegated powers of the Congress . This could mean the collapse of our whole commercial treaty system . Section 2 might actually ...
... language which might be interpreted as invalidating treaty provisions on matters not within the expressly delegated powers of the Congress . This could mean the collapse of our whole commercial treaty system . Section 2 might actually ...
Strana 5
... language of Senate Joint Resolution 3 confirms that such risks are inherent in the proposed resolution , just as they have been in its various predecessor versions . Although the language of Senate Joint Resolution 3 is uncertain in ...
... language of Senate Joint Resolution 3 confirms that such risks are inherent in the proposed resolution , just as they have been in its various predecessor versions . Although the language of Senate Joint Resolution 3 is uncertain in ...
Strana 6
... language which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution . Nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification of the ...
... language which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution . Nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification of the ...
Strana 7
... language of section 1 if that language were to become part of the Constitution . Regarding judicial interpretation . Hugh Evander Willis in his Constitutional Law of the United States , 1936 edition , page 94 , states : " The courts ...
... language of section 1 if that language were to become part of the Constitution . Regarding judicial interpretation . Hugh Evander Willis in his Constitutional Law of the United States , 1936 edition , page 94 , states : " The courts ...
Strana 11
... language incorporated in the present text and to several recent cases dealing with the legal effect of treaties and other international ments . Section 1 of Senate Joint Resolution 3 provides : agree- A provision of a treaty or other ...
... language incorporated in the present text and to several recent cases dealing with the legal effect of treaties and other international ments . Section 1 of Senate Joint Resolution 3 provides : agree- A provision of a treaty or other ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
3400 Chestnut Street 84th Congress act of Congress adopted advising and consenting American Bar Association armed forces Article authority Bill of Rights Bricker Amendment Cherokee Tobacco Chestnut Street Philadelphia clause College of Law Committee for Defense Constitution 36 West Constitution by Preserving constitutional amendment court-martial Dear Dean Fordham December 21 decision delegated executive agreements force or effect foreign affairs internal law international agreement January jurisdiction language Law School legislative effect limitation matter ment Missouri opinion opposed petitioner Preserving the Treaty President Professor of Law proposed amendment provision pursuance question ratification reservation S. J. Res School of Law Senate Joint Resolution Senate Judiciary Committee Senator Bricker Senator HENNINGS Senator KEFAUVER Sincerely Sixth Amendments statement statute supremacy clause Supreme Court supreme law tion treaties and executive treaty power treatymaking power trial by jury United valid views vote W. J. Schrenk West 44th Street York 36