 | United States. Office of Education - 1948 - 1010 str.
...governments of this Union repose excludes any general power of the State to standardize its children. . . . The child is not the mere creature of the State; those...destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to prepare him for additional obligations.5 With respect to the authority of the State to standardize... | |
 | 1955 - 1336 str.
...(p. 21). M See: Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 US 510 — "The child is not the mere creature of State. Those who nurture him and direct his destiny...with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for adult obligations." 6 "Always there is need of a judge to safeguard the constitutional guaranties of... | |
 | 1925 - 356 str.
...state to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the state; those...recognize and prepare him for additional obligations." In the Meyer case the statute, in part, provided: teacher, shall in any private, denominational or... | |
 | Alfred Ernest Stearns - 1925 - 312 str.
...State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the State; those...recognize and prepare him for additional obligations."* Such a statement, made by the highest authority in the land would seem to insure the continuance of... | |
 | 1926 - 862 str.
...state to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the state; those...recognize and prepare him for additional obligations." The court held, moreover, that if the act under consideration were enforced, the two corporations concerned... | |
 | 1926 - 1056 str.
...authorities, and instruction is adequately and appropriately given, there is a compliance with the law. [5] The child is not the mere creature of the state; those...recognize and prepare him for additional obligations. Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary, 45 S. Ct. 571, 268 US 510, 69... | |
 | 1926 - 748 str.
...State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the State; those...recognize and prepare him for additional obligations." So speaks the highest judicial tribunal of the nation. After that official pronouncement, those who... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1926 - 810 str.
...State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is ' not the mere creature of the State;...recognize and prepare him for additional obligations. Appellees are corporations and therefore, it is said, they cannot claim for themselves the liberty... | |
 | Cyrus Adler, Henrietta Szold - 1926 - 742 str.
...standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child i> not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture...recognize and prepare him for additional obligations." It is gratifying to note that the exponents of the new nativistic philosophy have found a courageous... | |
 | Lester William Bartlett - 1926 - 124 str.
...its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the creature of the state ; those who nurture him and...recognize and prepare him for additional obligations. [50] The enactments of a state, if unwarranted, will be set aside : carry on a lawful business or occupation,... | |
| |
The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of... 
