BY WILLIAM CRANCH,

CHIEF JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF

COLUMBIA.

POTIUS IGNORATIO JURIS LITIGIOSA EST, QUAM SCIENTIA.
CIC. DE 1.EGIBUS. DIAL. I.

District of Columbia, to wit:

E IT REMEMBERED), that on this twenty-fifth day of

six, and in the thirtieth year of American Independence, the Hon. WILLIAM CRANCH, of the said District, hath deposited in this Office the title of a book, the right whereof he claims as author, in the words following, to wit: "Reports of Cases, argued and adjudged in the Su

66

preme Court of the United States, in February Term, eighteen hundred and "four, and February Term, eighteen hundred and five," in conformity to the act. of congress of the United States, entitled “ An Act for the encouragement of

66

learning, by securing the copies of maps, charts and books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies during the times therein mentioned."

65

G. DENEALE, Clerk of the District of Columbia.

REPRINTED IN TAIWAN

CASES REPORTED.

ADAMS

DAMS qui tam, v. Woods,

B

Bailiff v. Tipping,
Ball, Dunlop and Co. v.
Barreme, et al. Little v.
Blackledge, Ogden v.
Blakeney v. Evans,
Blaireau, Mason v.
Boston Marine Insurance
Company, Graves v.
C
Capron v. Van Noorden,
Charming Betsy, Murray v.
Church v. Hubbart,
Coxe, Pennington
Coxe's Lessee, M'Ilvaine v. 280
D
Dunlop and Co. v. Ball,
E
Ellzey, Hepburn & Dun-
das v.
Evans, Blakeney v.
F
Faw v. Marsteller,
Fisher, et al. U. S. 9.
G
Graves et al. v. Boston Ma-
rine In. Com.
H
Hackley, Winchester v.

180

419

342

Head et. al. v. Prov. I. Com. 127
Hepburn et al. v. Ellzey,
Hubbart, Church v.

445

187

344

L Lamar, ct. al. Reily v.

page

Lee, Ogle v.

336 Little et al. v. Barreme et al. 170
Lytes, Williams et al. v.
406
M
180 Marsteller, Faw v.
170 Mason et al. v. ship Blaireau,240
272 M'Ilvaine v. Coxe's Lessee, 280
185 Murray v. Charming Betsy, 64
0
Ogden v. Blackledge,
419 Ogle v. Lee,

240

page 33

P
126 Pennington v. Coxe,
64 Providence In. Company,
187 Head et al. v.
33

R

10

272

33

33

127

4.4.5
T
185 Telfair v. Stead,
Tipping, Bailiff v.

10

U
358 U. S. v. Fisher, et al.
U. S. v. Schooner. Sally,
V
Van Noorden, Capron v.
W

Wagnon, Wood v.
Williams et al. v. Lyles,
Winchester v. Hackley,
Wood v. Wagnon,

9 9 342

9

Woods, Adams qui tam v. 336

407

4.06

358

406

126

Aquila,

Argo,

Angus, Purviance v.

Apthorp v. Backus, 304, 307, 333

250

Atcheson v. Everitt,
Ayles, Stanley, v.

B
Baas v. Tinge y,
Backus, Apth orp v.
Baker v. Paine,
Banks, Pattison v.
Bannister, Gibson v.
Barber v. Dennis,
Bazadone, Clark, v.

Beecher's case,.
Beaver,

Bell, Pollard v.

Potts v. Bernard v. Bernard, Bernardi v. Motteux, Bibb, Pleasants v. Bigg, Rex v.

Boehm, Carter v.
Bourdieu, Nutt v.

page.

14 262

256

73 Chapman's case,

Braxton, Page v.
Brown, Langley v.
Buckner, Papillon v.
Butler, Jackey v.
Byrom, Moss v.

85, 94
337
159

75, 106 304, 307, 333

450

127 250, 262 58, 90, 94 84, 85, 89 127 89

Cambridge, Knight v,

Camp v. Lockwood,
Carter v. Bochm

Carter v. Royal Ex. Ass. Co.
Champante, Leglise v.

Charming Betsy, Murray v.
287, 308, 329.

450

366

Chisholm v. state of Georgia, 446
Clark v. Bazadone,
Coleman v. Cooke,
Collet v. Lord Keith,
Cooke, Coleman v.
Cooke v. Oxley,
430 Cornelius, Hughes v.

200

366

162

201

366

380

183

Cotton, King v.
Cox v. Liotard,
Craw v. Ramsay,

366

262

290

16 157

D

Dayrell, Rorke v.
Dedire, Freemoult v.
Delmada v. Motteux,
De Mattos, Swaine v.
Dennis, Barber v.

с Cabot, Bingham v. 9, 208, 223, 450 Cadell, Mace v. 366 Calvin's. case, 290, 304, 310, .322

430

Fabius,

427
258

73 Fabrigas, Mostyn v.
Fairfax's case,
Fletcher, Planche v.

page 257

E East-India Company, Edie v. 163 Eden, Hamilton v. 299, 329 Edie v E. I. Company, 163 England, Quantock v. 279 431 Evans, Stevens v.

Bingham v. Cabot, 9, 208, 228, 450

Blaireau, Mason, v

406

41

337

258 Everitt, Atcheson v.
183
F

Lever v.

Fonereau, Seaman v.
Foster v. Wilmer,
Fox v. Hanbury,

305

431

199

73 284, 322 286

373

200

199

366

262

73 200

306, 329

199 199, 213 258, 431

199 427

Hamilton v. Eden,
Hanbury, Fox v.

Harmony,

Henderson, Maanss v.

Henkle v.
Royal Ex. Ass. Co.
Henrick and Maria,

Hick's case,

Hill v. Allen,
Hill, Wale v.
Hollingworth, Tooke v.

page

200 Lead Company v. Richardson,
251 Leglise v. Champante,
Lever v. Fletcher,
Leyfield's cases,

Liotard, Cox v.

Ibbotson v. Rhodes,
Joynes v. Statham,
Irvin, Neal v.

K Keith, Collet v. Kennoway, Noble v. Kensington, Garrels v. King, United States v. v. Cotton, Knight v. Cambridge,

L

Langley v. Brown,

J

Jackey Butler,

427

Jason v. Talbot, 83, 286, 302, 308

329

86

79

182

337

Lord Keith, Collet v.

183 Lumley v. Palmer,

84

73

199, 213

201 366

Lockwood, Campv.

305

London Ass. Com. v. Motteux, 430

Lord Fairfax's case,

306,329

200

159

201

M

201 Maanss v. Henderson,
Mace v. Cadell,
Maria,

431 366

79, 227 256 Maryatt, Wilson v. 94, 113, 301, 327 354 Mary Ford, 251,254, 256 299, 329 Mason, Gist v.

84 406

427

94
431
159
200, 230
337

v. Ship Blaireau,
Mayne v. Walter,
M'Donald's case,
Meriton v. Hornsby,
Miller v. Hall,

Moss v. Byrom,
Mostyn v. Fabrigas,

262

"

73 Motteux, Bernardi.
Delmada v.
v. London Ass. Co.
262 Murray v. Charming Betsy, 286,287

159
84

201

308, 329

384

N

Neal v. Irvin,
Noble v. Kennoway,
Nutt v. Bourdieu,

431 Odin,
430 Oxley, Cook v.

158

200 Page v. Braxton,
199
v. Fry,
79 Paine v. Baker,
359 Palmer v. Lumley,
380 Papillon v. Buckner,
257 Pattison v. Banks,

430 Pigou,

page

41

89

299, 329

262

Pelly v. Royal Ex. Ass. Co.
Perchard v. Whitmore,

354

258

200

89

199

430

158

199

258

81

162

189 427, 436, 440, 444 430 159

73

*366

199

440

96