 | Maryland. Court of Appeals, Thomas Harris, Reverdy Johnson - 1825 - 614 str.
...is to be considered, there can be no doubt it ought to.be laid entirely out of view, for there is na rule of law better settled, or more salutary in its...parol evidence to contradict, or substantially vary, thq. legal import of a written agreement." Whether parol evidence can be received to establish fraud,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1824 - 990 str.
...considered, there can be no Or the parae* doubt that it ought to be laid entirely out of view ; for there is no rule of law better settled, or more salutary in its application to contracts, than that 1834. which precludes the admission of parol evidence, '^£^t~' toco.ntradict or substantially vary... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1824 - 952 str.
...there can be no o" ISe"^!!?. doubt that it ought to be laid entirely out of view; ,"c°,.th'ircon" for there is no rule of law better settled, or more salutary in its application to contracts, than that1924. which precludes the admission of parol evidence, NtJ^^*/ to contradict or substantially vary... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1832 - 976 str.
...writing." the parties. This principle is laid down with great precision and force in 9 Wheaton 587. There is no rule of law better settled, or more salutary...or substantially vary the legal import of a written agree. ment. Evidence of usage or custom is, however, never considered of this character, but is received... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Chancery, Alonzo Christopher Paige - 1839 - 692 str.
...ground can a deed be contradicted by ptirol proof. The rule of evidence that parol proof is inadmissible to contradict or substantially vary the legal import of a written agreement, is the same in equity as at law. (Stevens v. Cooper, 1 John. Ch. R. 429.) Where the consideration is... | |
 | James Philemon Holcombe - 1846 - 376 str.
...established by independent testimony. Third ; Courts of Equity recognise the general inadmissibility of parol evidence to contradict, or substantially vary the legal import of a written agreement. Such testimony is not only contrary to the Statute of Frauds, but to the maxims of the common law,... | |
 | 1847 - 554 str.
...which it is to be considered, there can be no doubt that it ought to be laid entirely out of view ; for there is no rule of law better settled, or more salutary...substantially vary the legal import of a written agreement." Parol evidence may be admitted to explain a written agreement where there is a latent ambiguity ; or... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1847 - 710 str.
...resorted to, either to supply what may ba uncertain or defective in the writing." We conclude then that there is no rule of law better settled, or more salutary in its appl!cation,than that which refuses to admit oral testimony to contradict, vary, or materially affect,... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court, John Lansing Wendell - 1847 - 704 str.
...evidence. There is no rule better settled than that which declares that parol evidence is inadmissible to contradict or substantially vary the legal import of a written agreement, and especially one unEvans v. Wells. der seal. In the case of Stephens v. Cooper, I Johns. Ch. R. 429,... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1848 - 702 str.
...sustained by numerous and respectable authorities. We believe it to be a departure from that rule of law which precludes the admission of parol evidence, to...substantially vary the legal import of a written agreement, than which none is better settled, or more salutary in its application to contracts. But the dispute... | |
| |
... there is no rule of law better settled, or more salutary in its application to contracts, than that which precludes the admission of parol evidence to contradict or substantially vary the legal import of a written agreement. 
